NCAA out of Bounds in Sanctioning Penn State September 20, 2012
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: athletics, Bill O'Brien, college football, draconian, Jerry Sandusky, Joe Paterno, NCAA, Nittany Lions, penalty, Penn State, probation, Rodney Erickson, sanctions, scholarship, transfer
1 comment so far

Back-up placekicker Sam Ficken for Penn State, walking off the field dejected in losing on the road to Virginia. Ficken was the Nittany Lions’ back-up kicker, as their erstwhile starting kicker transferred to the University of Texas amid the chaos in Happy Valley.
Anybody who is remotely aware of the major developments in the world of big-time sports, specifically college football, has no doubt heard the news about the mountain of sanctions that the NCAA has arbitrarily heaped onto the once-vaunted football program of Pennsylvania State University, a.k.a., Penn State. These sanctions include a $60 million fine, a four-year postseason bowl ban, a Draconian reduction in scholarships (10 initial, 20 total each year for four years), and, to add insult to injury, vacate all the wins during the late Joe Paterno’s tenure dating back to 1998 – the year when the bulk of the child abuses perpetrated by then-assistant coach Jerry Sandusky were first internally known among some staff members.
Before the discussion proceeds any further, be it known and understood that I carry no water for Penn State. As a graduate of a Big 10 Conference rival, I had no love for a team that beat us in all the years that we played them during my time as a college student. Furthermore, I make no apologies for the stubborn refusal of JoePa to plan and execute his own exit strategy, which he should have done a full decade before his sudden and long-overdue ouster in 2011. Most importantly, this not in any way to rationalize the evils perpetrated by Sandusky, nor to be insensitive to the undue emotional and spiritual scarring wrought upon the innocent young victims.
But what did these evils themselves have to do with the football program at large? Sandusky was found guilty of these heinous crimes in the court of law, and awaits a sentence that will surely be tantamount to spending the rest of his life in prison. He has not been directly affiliated with the program since the end of the 1999 season. Moreover, Paterno has not only ceased to the head coach at PSU – a position he held for more than four decades – but he is deceased. The two individuals to whom legitimate blame for these evils is warranted – the perpetrator in Sandusky and the enabler in Paterno – are either in jail or are underneath the sod (in this case, respectively!).
The point is, the crimes that were done by Sandusky and on Paterno’s watch were transgressions of the legal nature, and were punished in the legal realm. Whatever further punishment awaits both in the next life is a matter for the theologians to debate. But this had nothing to do with NCAA ethics. And is that not the grounds for which this august governing body for collegiate athletics metes out its punishment to member athletics departments?
The NCAA, in their supposed magnanimity, allowed for players currently on the roster of the Penn State football team to transfer to other programs without being forced to sit out for year. Under normal circumstances, players on a Division 1A (pardon me, Football Bowl Subdivision, or FBS) program who choose to transfer to another school/team have to sit out for one season, unless they transfer to a Division 1AA program (pardon me, Football Championship Subdivision, or FCS). For example, if a player is on the roster at, say, the University of Cincinnati, he feels as though he is not a good fit after all, and decides to play elsewhere, he could transfer, to say, Eastern Kentucky University, and play immediately. Not so if he were to transfer to, say, the University of Toledo, or Kent State, the University of Kentucky, or of Louisville, and expect to play immediately, for the NCAA mandates that such a lateral transfer requires the given student to sit out for a year.
At least the governing body in question had the decency to recognize that the current players on the team had nothing to do with the aforementioned evils, and should be let off the proverbial hook so they could continue to be in a position to reap the rewards that winning effort on the field allows. For they have waived the traditional transfer rule and have allowed current PSU players to go to other FBS teams that have a chance to go to a bowl game, thus leaving Penn State in a further weakened state than it already is. At least ten players have taken up the NCAA on this offer, and have transferred elsewhere, notably to Illinois, to Florida, to Texas, N.C. State, even to Cal and USC.
All this leaves the Penn State program in a severely weakened state. The players worth any count have been given the option to seek greener pastures, and have naturally done so. The remaining players are, according to reason, less skilled, and the performance on the field – losing at home to Ohio U at home and to Virginia on the road – with a back-up kicker missing key field goals (the starting kicker wisely fled to join the Texas Longhorns, whose collective star is on the re-rise).
To sum things up, the program is $60 million poorer, bereft of its more-skilled players, and unable to attract players worth any count for the next four years at least on account of both losing some of its scholarships to offer, to say nothing of no prospects of a post-season bowl game for that length of time, no matter how well the team does in the regular season. In short, the NCAA essentially gave them a walking death penalty. The only reason that Penn State acquiesced to these stringent terms is that if PSU did not, the NCAA would have given them the real thing, according to the new president of the university, Rodney Erickson.
The only time the NCAA handed down the “death penalty” to a football program (where the program is not allowed to even field a team and play that sport for an entire season) was to SMU in 1987. The ruling’s reasons, according to NCAA investigators, were, among others, an under-the-table slush fund given to Mustang players, $61,000 total, to be exact. SMU forewent fielding a team for 1988 as well. Contrast that with the Nevin Shapiro booster scandal at the University of Miami (Fla.) that came to light in 2011. According to Shapiro’s own admissions in numerous jailhouse interviews (currently, he is serving a prison term for a $930 million Ponzi scheme), he provided U of Miami football players with “cash, prostitutes, entertainment in his multimillion-dollar homes and yacht, paid trips to high-end restaurants and nightclubs, jewelry, bounties for on-field play (including bounties for injuring opposing players), travel and, on one occasion, an abortion.”
In both the case of SMU as well as Miami, clear recruiting and player compensation violations took place: ethical violations that warranted/warrant NCAA punishment to those programs. Yet Nevin Shapiro’s egregious violations make the SMU slush fund pale in comparison, yet the NCAA has yet to hand down any sanctions whatsoever to “The U.”
Meanwhile, no evidence has yet surfaced regarding the crimes of Jerry Sandusky and the tacit enabling of them by Joe Paterno having any bearing at all on recruiting violations, player compensation, or even cruelty towards players, or any other act which would legally and ethically warrant such Draconian punishment from the NCAA.
As mentioned before, the perpetrator and enablers are long gone from the University. Sandusky awaits his prison sentence, Paterno is under the sod, and anybody else connected to Joe[Grand]Pa, including the former athletics director and even the former university president himself, both former players under Paterno, have been summarily dismissed. Penn State has a new head football coach, a new A.D., and also a new president of this highly respected university. They are earnestly trying to “grow new grass,” so to speak. Why punish them, not to mention the players who have commendably made up their minds to commit their college-playing eligibility to this institution in the wake of these horrifying scandals? Why punish the 107,000+ fans who show up at Beaver Stadium on Saturdays in the Fall? Why punish the millions of Nittany Lion faithful over the actions of a few individuals whose violations were strictly within the legal realm, and had nothing to do with NCAA infractions?
At this time of PSU’s darkest hours, I would advise the rest of the Big Ten fan bases not to dance on the Nittany Lions’ grave. A weakened Penn State means a weakened Big 10 Conference, this at a time when cold weather programs are increasingly at a competitive disadvantage in terms of recruiting the best players nationwide, hence are struggling to be credible contenders for national titles. It also means weakened intra-conference competition, something that could affect other conference teams’ strength of schedules and possibly their national rankings. A strong PSU team would mean the opposite of these potential problems.
If the sages in Indianapolis dictated that the $60 million fine go to programs that work to prevent child abuse and molestation, that would be a fitting penalty that all parties concerned could embrace. But instead, a bunch of detached elitists decided to proceed much further than necessary and bring hard times to a proud university, to a state, and to its national fan base. Shame on the NCAA for unduly and arbitrarily forcing Penn State’s football program into an induced coma. Sanctions towards other programs guilty of actual violations within their jurisdiction are warranted but remain to be administered. The governing body has some explaining to do for this clear double-standard.
As an aside, the new head coach has yet to get the hint that part of “growing new grass” means a clean break from those blindingly generic uniforms. Nameplates on the back of the jerseys are not enough. Bill O’Brien worked in the NFL long enough to understand what a helmet logo decal looks like. It will be interesting to see if and when he eventually gets the hint and starts having some football-shaped Nittany Lion logo decals affixed to the sides of those mind-numbingly generic white helmets. If these horrific developments do not sound the clarion call for Penn State to ditch those horribly generic unis once and for all, what will?
College Football Week 3 Awards September 17, 2012
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Auburn, awards, Ball State, Boise State, BYU, Cal, California, Charlie Strong, Clemson, college football, Colorado, Connecticut, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida, Florida Atlantic, Florida International, Florida State, Fresno State, Gene Chizik, Idaho, Indiana, James Franklin, John L. Smith, Joker Phillips, Kansas State, Kentucky, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, LSU, Mack Brown, Mark Dantonio, Mark Richt, Maryland, Memphis, Michigan State, Mississippi State, Missouri, Navy, NCAA, North Carolina, Northwestern, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pat Fitzgerald, Penn State, Pittsburgh, Purdue, rivals, South Carolina, Stanford, Temple, Tennessee, Texas, Todd Berry, Troy, UAB, USC, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Western Kentucky, Yahoo!
1 comment so far
It was so much fun. Every Sunday afternoon in the Fall of very recent years, we looked forward to the sportswriters of Rivals/Yahoo.com giving us their take on the good, the bad, and the ugly of the college football games and teams from the previous day. Their awards were very informal yet well to the point, and never failed to produce a number of chuckles and at times a few belly laughs. Those days seem to be gone. Yahoo!’s online sports section has been given a sleek makeover, but in this new format, the weekly awards seem to have been lost by the wayside. Maybe one could account for this because one of their main writers, Tom Dienhart, now blogs for the Big Ten Network. Who knows? The bottom line is, despite my best efforts, I cannot find it anymore. What website that is worth its weight in attracting eyeballs would make such an enjoyable weekly post so hard to find?
With all of this in mind, inspiration hit me last night to take it upon myself to dole out the awards instead. Afterall, I’m an alumnus of a Big Ten program, and have worked with coaches now on a number of “Big-Six” conference teams. It may not be Rivals/Yahoo!, but if you love college football, you might be apt to find this to be the next best thing. I have tweaked some of the awards to suit the unique situations that arise from week to week, but for the most part, the awards are the same. Therefore, I offer the awards for the third week of major college football, and aim to continue to do so until the able writers at Yahoo! ‘get it together’ and resume their Sunday duties.
Wish I were him: Mack Brown, Texas
Glad I’m not him: Mark Dantonio, Michigan State
Lucky guy: Gene Chizik, Auburn
Poor guy: Todd Berry, Louisiana-Monroe
Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Charlie Strong, Louisville
Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Pat Fitzgerald, Northwestern
Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Joker Phillips, Kentucky
Desperately seeking … anything: John L. Smith, Arkansas
TEAMS
Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Purdue (beat Eastern Michigan 54-16)
Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: Mississippi State (beat Troy 30-24)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Idaho (lost to LSU 63-14)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t: Pittsburgh (beat Virginia Tech 35-17)
Thought you’d reach a turning point, you didn’t: Tennessee (lost to Florida 37-20)
Dang, they’re good: Alabama
Dang, they’re bad: Colorado (or Kentucky: take your pick!)
Ya’ know, they’re not so bad: Cal
Did the season start? Penn State
Can the season end? Navy
Can the season never end? Stanford
Play this again: Stanford 21, USC 14
Never play this again: Fresno State 69, Colorado 14
Unbelieveable Irony: Connecticut 24, Maryland 21
What? Ball State 41, Indiana 39
Huh? Notre Dame 20, Michigan State 3
Are you kidding me? Pittsburgh 35, Virginia Tech 17
Oh – my – God: Western Kentucky 31, Kentucky 30
Told you so: Louisville 39, North Carolina 34
NEXT WEEK
Ticket to die for: No. 11 Clemson @ No. 5 Florida State
Best non-Big Six vs. Big Six matchup: Florida International vs. Louisville
Best non-Big Six matchup: BYU @ Boise State
Upset alert: Kansas State @ Oklahoma
Must win: USC vs. California
Offensive explosion: Arizona @ Oregon
Defensive struggle: Temple @ Penn State
Great game no one is talking about: Missouri @ South Carolina
Intriguing coaching matchup: Mark Richt of Georgia vs. James Franklin of Vanderbilt
Who’s bringing the body bags? Florida Atlantic @ Alabama
Why are they playing? UAB @ Ohio State
Plenty of good seats remaining: Memphis @ Duke
They shoot horses, don’t they? Maryland @ West Virginia
What are your thoughts, dear readers? Comments are welcome!
Classical Music guide addendum December 14, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Pop Culture.Tags: Boccherini, Brahms, Carl Philipp Emanuel, Couperin, Gabrieli, Gershwin, Gottschalk, Ives, Johann Christian, Mendelssohn, Penderecki, Schoenberg, Schubert, Telemann, Wilhelm Friedemann
add a comment
Asteroid headed for Earth….sort of. November 7, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Science.Tags: asteroid, Earth, impact, Jay Melosh, moon, Purdue, science, scientist, YU55
add a comment
No doubt everyone can breathe a sigh of relief after reading those last two words of the headline. But it is true, sort of. An asteroid that is a quarter of a mile long — bigger than even America’s largest aircraft carrier, is headed towards the near-vicinity of Earth. Officially named YU55, its current trajectory has it flying by the third rock from the Sun on Nov. 8 at a distance of only 202,ooo miles — closer than the Moon (at only 240,000 miles away).
Scientists have been studying this asteroid long enough to be as certain as humanly possible that it will not hit Earth. If it did — Heaven forbid — though, the result would be a possible oceanic impact, with 70-foot tsunami waves 60 miles away, and causing a 7.0 earthquake that that part of the world. So says asteroid impact expert Jay Melosh of Purdue University, my alma mater.
This scenario pales in comparison to the fictional scenario from Armageddon, where that fictional asteroid was the size of Texas, and should it have crashed into the Pacific Ocean, would have caused a tidal wave to wash up to Denver, and enough dust to cloud out the Sun for an epoch. But as Melosh points out, impacts of the relative proportion of the very real YU55 happen about every 100,000 years. The comforting, silver lining in that otherwise rather disturbing thought is that such impacts are survivable, provided that you’re not within, say, 75 to 100 miles of said impact.
In the meantime, though, this close encounter with the asteroid kind gives scientists and lay astronomers alike the golden opportunity to see a huge chunk of extraterrestrial rock up close and personally. Sites for astronomy enthusiasts have been mapping where in the sky YU55 is expected to pass through. But more importantly, a prevailing theory regarding how the Earth took form involves asteroids, specifically that they were responsible for depositing water and minerals on the planet as it was cooling some two or three billion years ago. YU55’s close, though fleeting, proximity will give professional researchers the opportunity to collect telemetric data that will allow for scientists to test this theory. It also lets astronomers take a close look at the class “C” of asteroids, which are very common but not very well understood. No doubt the upcoming astronomical event could help us rectify that problem.
Fifty newly discovered planets announced September 30, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Science.Tags: astronomy, exoplanets, life-supporting, planets, super-earth
1 comment so far
The largest haul yet of newly discovered extrasolar planets was recently announced. That alone is news, but the types of planets discovered within said haul makes for even more amazing news. In addition to numerous Neptune-like planets, scientists have also discovered what they call “super-Earths” that orbit stars very similar to our sun. One planet in particular, dubbed HD 85512b, lies at the edge of what astronomers have determined to be the star system’s “habitable zone.”
That term deserves a bit of explanation. Layman and scientist alike clamor for finding a planet that can support life as we know it. But to do that requires particular conditions that were not discovered outside of our solar system until recently. Basically, the “habitable zone” is the distance range from a given star in which a planet can orbit and be able to support life. Too close to the star outside of this zone, and any water — aside from a Nitrogen-Oxygen mix atmosphere, is pretty much the Nummer Eins requirement for complex organisms to survive — will boil away (read: Venus). Too far away from the star, and water will perpetually freeze (Mars being a borderline case in that regard). What scientist have just discovered are some planets within the zone — not too cold, not too hot, but just right.
Another such planet inhabiting its own “Goldilocks zone” is a world dubbed Gliese 581d, though it orbits a red dwarf star, and as such, its habitable zone is much closer to its respective star than Earth’s orbit is to our Sun. On the other hand, should the system in which the binary Rigel star (a.k.a., Orion’s left foot) have such a zone, it would be much further away. The reasons could hardly be more obvious. In addition to being many times the size of our Sun, it also burns much hotter: it’s temperature is about 11,000 Kelvin, in contrast to the Sun’s comparatively milder 5,778 K emanating from its photosphere. Translation: Rigel’s habitable zone, should it even have one, would be a heckuva lot further away from that star than Earth 93 million-mile distance from Sol.
Seeing things in a larger context, it is remarkable how many gas giants have been discovered outside of our solar system, but how very few smaller rock planets we have found. As Earthlings, it is only natural to see things within the purview of our own star’s system, and as such, we are quite apt to see Jupiter, Neptune, and Saturn as exceptional worlds. But given the extrasolar gas giant-to-rock planet discovery ratio as of late, these recent developments should serve as a reminder how truly exceptional this third rock from the Sun is.
Leftists hijacking Jesus September 25, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Politics.Tags: Bible, Christian, free will, freeborn, God, Jesus, legalized theft, New Testament, Savior, Ten Commandments, theft, violation
add a comment
This photo was taken at an Anti-Tea Party rally. Apparently there are a lot of people out there that think taxes are not high enough, and that there is not enough government intrusion and regulation in our lives. But all sarcasm aside, this protest sign is disingenuous on a host of levels. Start with the “brown-skinned” premise. Was he as light-skinned as northern Europeans and their descendants in the western and southern hemispheres? Most likely not. But the fact that Jesus and was a semite does not make him “brown-skinned,” especially not compared to those of sub-Saharan African ancestry. Sorry, but those are the facts.
The “free health care” angle is also disingenuous. Yes, Jesus cared for people; the New Testament has many wonderful accounts of Jesus healing the sick, helping the crippled walk and helping the blind see. But He did those things: he did not farm it out to somebody else, and did not take credit for what others did. Those who advocate nationalized healthcare do so mostly on the grounds of “compassion,” but like other government programs in the name of such “compassion,” such advocates over look the obvious fact that it is very easy to be “compassionate” when you are doing so with other people’s money. Jesus did not need other people’s money to administer his own free health care. Rather, Christ’s very actions demonstrate the effectiveness of do-it-yourself conservatism.
Saving the best for last, it is about time somebody tackled this undue association of “socialism” with Our Lord and Savior. Christ was a Jew, by his own admission. As a practicing Jew, he was expected to abide by the Ten Commandments — they were handed down by His father, after all. Commandment No. 8 could not be simpler: Thou shalt not steal. When a thief violates this commandment he (or she) is essentially redistributing wealth/income. The only difference between what a thief does and what governments do in the name of wealth redistribution (which, hello, is what socialism — and liberalism — is all about) is merely a matter of legality. When Jesus suggested that the wealthy ought to sell their possessions and give the bulk of those proceeds to help the poor, he never mentioned a thing about the wealthy being forced to give up their wealth. If they were/are to do so, they do so on their own accord, out of their own free will. To force them by any means would be to violate our Heavenly Father’s rule of allowing people to exercise their free will, which in itself is a reminder that our status as freeborn citizens is a birthright given by our Lord.
The irony in all of this is that many people who advocate big government liberalism are already wealthy, and are well-aware that government will not tax their wealth, only their income (which, in many of their cases, is practically nil). Taxing income is the biggest entry barrier towards other people attaining their own wealth. In addition to this blatant phoniness, they enlist the help of liberals who are not wealthy by playing on their half-baked ideas of Christianity, while ignoring the faith’s true message.
The above sign might make for a clever sound bite, but it remains an obfuscation of the fact that Christianity and liberalism/socialism are two opposite things, and you cannot adhere to both at the same time, for doing so would be in violation of Commandment Number One. Simply put, those who worship the small “g” (government) violate that commandment handed down by the big “G” (that would be God).
What is truly interesting is that the very same folks who try to hijack Jesus into their secularist ideology make up the very same factions who attempt to surpress Christianity in the public square at every opportunity. This is yet another example of how the respective religion and ideology are, in the end, very much opposed to one-another as Doug Giles not-so-subtly points out.
While I’m at it, what mainstream conservative has been referring to B. Hussein Obama as a “brown-skinned, anti-war socialist” anyhow? Do I detect yet another strawman argument from the left? Note to libs: that was a rhetorical question.
Relativity Theory no longer ‘settled science.’ September 23, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Science.Tags: Al Gore, As Time Goes By, CERN, discovery, Einstein, Fermilab, light speed, neutrinos, physics, science, scientist, scrutiny, settled science, speed of light, standard, sub-atomic particles, theory, Theory of Relativity
add a comment
This day and age we’re living in
Gives cause for apprehension
With speed and new inventions,
And things like Third Dimensions.
Yet, we get a trifle weary
With Mr. Einstein’s theory….
Apparently, not anymore. Albert Einstein’s famous Theory of Relativity, introduced to the world in 1905, caused us to rethink lots of things about physics. Part of the contention within that theory is that nothing can go faster than the speed of light, or 186,282 miles per second. Oh, and it was within that theory that Einstein gave us the famous equation E = mc(squared), or, Energy equals mass times the speed of light, squared. Just thinking about that alone could make one a trifle weary, as Herman Hupfield so eloquently penned 80 years ago.
Basically, it has been a pillar of the very science of physics for over a hundred years that nothing can go faster than the speed of light — Einstein’s theory helped establish that very principle. So, for a little over a century, that principle has essentially been treated as “settled science.”
All that has been turned on its proverbial head with a very recent announcement that scientists at CERN, or the European Organization for Nuclear Research (actually, it stands for “Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire,” in case you’re keeping score at home), clocked neutrinos — odd slivers of an atom — travelling a distance of 450 miles in a time 60 nanoseconds faster than light travelling that same span. Needless to say, this announcement has turned more than a few heads in the scientific community, and has invited almost an many skeptics.
One thing that has invited scrutiny is the very nature of neutrinos themselves. As sub-atomic particles, not everything is understood about them. They have been baffling scientists for 80 years (read between those lines, and it’s downright amazing that scientists even knew about neutrinos in the early 1930s). They are nearly mass-less, and the dear reader would be well-served to keep in mind that atoms themselves are mostly empty space.
Phillip Schewe, communications director at the Joint Quantum Institute in Maryland, offered some perspective on these enigmatic particles, saying that the neutrino has almost no mass, comes in three different “flavors,” may have its own antiparticle and has been seen shifting from one flavor to another while shooting out from our sun.
To complicate things further, to say nothing about the validity of these potentially ground-shifting findings, is that different levels of energy, according to some schools of thought, can affect the speed at which neutrinos can travel. Naturally, just mentioning the term “neutrino” can cause the average reader to blink more than once, so to help create understanding about the context of these potentially game-changing scientific measurements, one can resort to Howstuffworks.com to give a rather brief explanation about neutrinos that the non-scientifically inclined can understand. Another explanation on neutrinos on the same website can be found here.
The reason I keep labeling these as “findings” and not an outright discovery is because the very scientists who took the readings are reticent to use that term. Like good, objectively-minded scientists, they actually invite the scrutiny, inviting other scientists to independently verify the data before using the vaunted ‘d’ word. Scientists at the competing Fermilab in Chicago already have announced their intention to run tests to see if the readings can be duplicated.
So have the rules of the game of physics changed? Chances are, there are about to. But seeing things in a broader context, if the idea that nothing can exceed light speed as “settled science” is on the verge of being invalidated, what else could be rendered out of date as a theory in the years to come? Former Vice President Algore has been — very un-scientifically — claiming that “global warming” has been “settled science” practically since he left the Blair House. What’s more, he has denounced anybody who denies that which he claims as tantamount to racists. Seriously. Yet the overall lesson to be learned is, if even Mr. Einstein’s theory is no longer settled science, theoretically, nothing could be. After all, as I myself noted in another recent post, nothing is static, as the science of physics has taught us time and again.
And that is fine. Unbiased science requires constant questioning, not necessarily of obvious, plain-as-day fundamentals (why waste the mental energy and everyone’s time?), but certain long-standing theories could always stand some questioning. If the theories are sufficiently valid, they shall always stand up to scrutiny. If not, they shall go the way of phrenology and alchemy. Plus, on an even brighter note, we could be that much closer to discovering the hidden key to warp speed!
As an aside, the opening poetic stanza is from the ever-famous, ever-timeless song “As Time Goes By,” written by Herman Hupfield in 1931. Rudy Vallee recorded a version of that standard that same year, and to me, it remains one of the best of the countless versions rendered by countless artists over the past eight decades. The only other version that stands above the rest is Dooley Wilson’s famous rendition from “Casablanca” in 1942. That said, Billie Holiday’s 1944 version is not too shabby, either.

