College Football Week 4 Awards September 24, 2012
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: Al Golden, Alabama, Arkansas, Art Briles, Baylor, Brady Hoke, Buffalo, Central Michigan, college football, Colorado, Connecticut, Dana Holgorsen, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Idaho, Idaho State, Illinois, Iowa, Jim Mora, Jimbo Fisher, Joker Phillips, Kansas State, Kentucky, Kyle Flood, Louisiana Tech, Louisville, LSU, Marshall, Maryland, Miami, Michigan, Michigan State, NCAA, Nebraska, North Carolina, Northern Illinois, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Oregon, Oregon State, Paul Johnson, Penn State, Purdue, Rice, Rutgers, South Carolina, Southern Miss, Stanford, Texas, Tim Beckman, Towson, UAB, UCLA, Washington, Washington State, West Virginia
add a comment
In just our second week of picking up where the good sportswriters at Yahoo ! left off, here are the week 4 awards for college football teams and coaches – enjoy!
COACHES
Wish I were him: Jimbo Fisher, Florida State (notwithstanding his son’s illness)
Glad I’m not him: Brady Hoke, Michigan
Lucky guy: Al Golden, Miami (Fla.)
Poor guy: Paul Johnson, Georgia Tech
Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Jim Mora, UCLA
Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Kyle Flood, Rutgers
Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Tim Beckman, Illinois
Desperately seeking … anything: Joker Phillips, Kentucky
TEAMS
Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Alabama
Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: West Virginia (defeated Maryland 31-21)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Kentucky (lost to Florida 38-0)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t: UAB (lost to Ohio State 29-15)
Thought you wouldn’t kick butt, you did: Louisiana Tech (defeated Illinois 52-24)
Dang, they’re good: Oregon
Dang, they’re bad: Arkansas
Did the season start? Michigan
Can the season end? Kentucky
Can the season never end? Florida State
GAMES
Play this again: Marshall 54, Rice 51, 2OT
Never play this again: Nebraska 73, Idaho St. 7
What? Rutgers 35, Arkansas 26
Huh? Oregon St. 27, No. 19 UCLA 20
Are you kidding me? Colorado 35, Washington State 34
Oh – my – God: Central Michigan 32, Iowa 31
Told you so: No. 15 Kansas State 24, No. 6 Oklahoma 19
NEXT WEEK
Ticket to die for: No. 12 Texas @ Oklahoma State (or Tennessee @ No. 5 Georgia)
Best non-Big Six vs. Big Six matchup: Louisville @ Southern Miss
Best non-Big Six matchup: Central Michigan @ Northern Illinois
Upset alert: No. 7 South Carolina @ Kentucky
Must win: No. 21 Michigan State vs. No. 16 Ohio State
Offensive explosion: Oregon @ Washington State
Defensive struggle: Penn State @ Illinois
Great game no one is talking about: No. 9 Stanford @ Washington, Thurs., 9 PM EDT
Intriguing coaching matchup: Dana Holgorsen of West Virginia vs. Art Briles of Baylor
Who’s bringing the body bags? Towson @ LSU
Why are they playing? Idaho @ North Carolina
Plenty of good seats remaining: Buffalo @ Connecticut
They shoot horses, don’t they? Marshall @ Purdue
College Football Week 3 Awards September 17, 2012
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Auburn, awards, Ball State, Boise State, BYU, Cal, California, Charlie Strong, Clemson, college football, Colorado, Connecticut, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida, Florida Atlantic, Florida International, Florida State, Fresno State, Gene Chizik, Idaho, Indiana, James Franklin, John L. Smith, Joker Phillips, Kansas State, Kentucky, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, LSU, Mack Brown, Mark Dantonio, Mark Richt, Maryland, Memphis, Michigan State, Mississippi State, Missouri, Navy, NCAA, North Carolina, Northwestern, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pat Fitzgerald, Penn State, Pittsburgh, Purdue, rivals, South Carolina, Stanford, Temple, Tennessee, Texas, Todd Berry, Troy, UAB, USC, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Western Kentucky, Yahoo!
1 comment so far
It was so much fun. Every Sunday afternoon in the Fall of very recent years, we looked forward to the sportswriters of Rivals/Yahoo.com giving us their take on the good, the bad, and the ugly of the college football games and teams from the previous day. Their awards were very informal yet well to the point, and never failed to produce a number of chuckles and at times a few belly laughs. Those days seem to be gone. Yahoo!’s online sports section has been given a sleek makeover, but in this new format, the weekly awards seem to have been lost by the wayside. Maybe one could account for this because one of their main writers, Tom Dienhart, now blogs for the Big Ten Network. Who knows? The bottom line is, despite my best efforts, I cannot find it anymore. What website that is worth its weight in attracting eyeballs would make such an enjoyable weekly post so hard to find?
With all of this in mind, inspiration hit me last night to take it upon myself to dole out the awards instead. Afterall, I’m an alumnus of a Big Ten program, and have worked with coaches now on a number of “Big-Six” conference teams. It may not be Rivals/Yahoo!, but if you love college football, you might be apt to find this to be the next best thing. I have tweaked some of the awards to suit the unique situations that arise from week to week, but for the most part, the awards are the same. Therefore, I offer the awards for the third week of major college football, and aim to continue to do so until the able writers at Yahoo! ‘get it together’ and resume their Sunday duties.
Wish I were him: Mack Brown, Texas
Glad I’m not him: Mark Dantonio, Michigan State
Lucky guy: Gene Chizik, Auburn
Poor guy: Todd Berry, Louisiana-Monroe
Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Charlie Strong, Louisville
Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Pat Fitzgerald, Northwestern
Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Joker Phillips, Kentucky
Desperately seeking … anything: John L. Smith, Arkansas
TEAMS
Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Purdue (beat Eastern Michigan 54-16)
Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: Mississippi State (beat Troy 30-24)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Idaho (lost to LSU 63-14)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t: Pittsburgh (beat Virginia Tech 35-17)
Thought you’d reach a turning point, you didn’t: Tennessee (lost to Florida 37-20)
Dang, they’re good: Alabama
Dang, they’re bad: Colorado (or Kentucky: take your pick!)
Ya’ know, they’re not so bad: Cal
Did the season start? Penn State
Can the season end? Navy
Can the season never end? Stanford
Play this again: Stanford 21, USC 14
Never play this again: Fresno State 69, Colorado 14
Unbelieveable Irony: Connecticut 24, Maryland 21
What? Ball State 41, Indiana 39
Huh? Notre Dame 20, Michigan State 3
Are you kidding me? Pittsburgh 35, Virginia Tech 17
Oh – my – God: Western Kentucky 31, Kentucky 30
Told you so: Louisville 39, North Carolina 34
NEXT WEEK
Ticket to die for: No. 11 Clemson @ No. 5 Florida State
Best non-Big Six vs. Big Six matchup: Florida International vs. Louisville
Best non-Big Six matchup: BYU @ Boise State
Upset alert: Kansas State @ Oklahoma
Must win: USC vs. California
Offensive explosion: Arizona @ Oregon
Defensive struggle: Temple @ Penn State
Great game no one is talking about: Missouri @ South Carolina
Intriguing coaching matchup: Mark Richt of Georgia vs. James Franklin of Vanderbilt
Who’s bringing the body bags? Florida Atlantic @ Alabama
Why are they playing? UAB @ Ohio State
Plenty of good seats remaining: Memphis @ Duke
They shoot horses, don’t they? Maryland @ West Virginia
What are your thoughts, dear readers? Comments are welcome!
Whither the conferences in major college football? September 8, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: ACC, Big 8, Big East, Big Ten, Big XII, Colorado, conferences, football, Jupiter, Miami, NCAA, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, SEC, solar system, Southeastern Conference, static, SWC, Texas, Texas A&M, Virginia Tech
2 comments
When I teach my course in American government at my community college in Louisville, one thing I have taken to doing early in the course’s term is to hand out a sheet to each student with a list of important rules in physics/economics. My rationale for this is to get the students thinking about the potential consequences of certain actions on the part of government. One such rule I lay out for them is thus: “Nothing is static.” Just try to disprove that rule. After all, nothing is static in the economy, nothing is static in our own interpersonal relationships, the climate is certainly not static — regardless of what the enviro-socialists want us to think — and indeed, nothing is static in the Solar system, not with variations in solar radiation output that have implications for the temperatures on this planet as well as for Mars and the Gallilean satellites around Jupiter.
The recent announcement that Texas A&M will depart the Big XII Conference for the Southeastern Conference come June of next year has reminded me of this rule once again. Though this is not the first move of a D-1A (pardon me, Football Bowl Subdivision) school to shake things up a bit regarding conference affilition, this one move could open the floodgates for radical conference realignment, the likes of which none of us have seen in our lifetime.
Most moves up to this point seemed fairly self-contained. When the Southwest Conference folded after 1995, the top four teams in that conference joined the Big 8, thus giving birth to the Big XII. The other four teams disbersed, many initially ending up in Conference USA, which banded together lots of erstwhile mid-majors and independents. The arrangement within the Big XII was one that on paper made geographic sense, at least longitudinally (much like the erstwhile Pac-10), with Nebraska the anchoring power in the north, and Texas the anchoring power in the south. Furthermore, should Texas have a down year, Oklahoma was eventually strong enough to fill that power gap on the southern end.
The switch-ups we witnessed earlier last decade did not seem to portend major realignment, either. The only thing that Miami, Virginia Tech, and Boston College bolting from the Big East to the Atlantic Coast Conference amounted to was to question whether or not the former still deserved to have a berth in the BCS bowl games.
All that was put in jeopardy with Nebraska bolting for the Big Ten after last season. Less consequential was Colorado moving to join the Pac-10, now the Pac-12. As things currently stand, the Big Ten now has 12 teams, and the Big XII has been reduced to nine, or at least will be with the Aggies’ imminent departure. This current state of affairs raises two simultaneous possibilities. For one, many thought that even though the Cornhuskers left for the Big Ten, the Big XII could still limp on, possibly even bring in new up-and-coming teams to fill the void left by the Huskers and the Buffaloes. With A&M soon to leave, the death knell for the Big XII has been all but sounded. Even though, at this moment, Oklahoma and Texas both remain, and Oklahoma State would add increasing credibility, given their up-and-coming status (thank you, T. Boone Pickens), the gradual disintegration of the conference, first at the northern end and now at the southern end leaves many to conclude that more dominos shall inevitably fall.
One such departure has already pushed Southeastern Conference membership to a future number of 13. Further speculation has been fueled as to whom else the SEC might court. Already, conferences such as the Pac-12 have been making major overtures for the Sooners and the Cowboys to join them. The Longhorns are an even more juicy target for conferences as well, though UT, what with its special brand and its own sports channel in the newly-created Longhorn Network, has the prestige, winning tradition, not to mention geographic advantages to be successful as an independent. Indeed, what we may be witnessing is Texas becoming the Notre Dame of the 21st Century in terms of athletic prestige, winning tradition, privileged status, and ability to attract top recruits.
But, in returning to the point of the SEC’s burgeoning membership, 13 could be a magic number, magic in the sense that it creates the possibly for that number to grow further, not just for the southeastern juggernaut power, but for conferences elsewhere. As mentioned earlier, the possibility persists that Oklahoma and Oklahoma State could end up in the Pac-12, bumping their lucky number up to fourteen. Moreover, it is not inconceivable that Texas could join that new mega-conference as well. USC plus the Sooners plus the Longhorns equals one formidable conference indeed. Iowa State could end up following suit in a different sense by joining the Big Ten (Nebraska is already there, and in-state rival Iowa has been a long-time member). Geographically, that theoretical move is quite logical. Where Kansas, Kansas State, Baylor, Missouri and Texas Tech might end up — again, should the dominoes continue to fall — is anybody’s guess, though the Mizzou Tigers might end up joining the Big Ten as well. That possibility has been broached several times before, in fact. My only reservation against that is, can one conference abide three different teams whose colors are (officially) Old Gold & Black?
While there could be a scramble for a would-be disintegrated Big XII’s table scraps, the Southeastern Conference might try to bring in other powers to join their juggernaut league (Florida State and Virginia Tech have been listed as possibilities). Might such a conference cannibalization prompt the ACC and the Big East to join forces? Given that Texas A&M has turned its back on its long-time rivals and all-too willingly allowed itself to be used by the SEC, perhaps all of us ought to rethink what is possible.
The bottom line in all of these prognostications is that we could be witnessing a radical realignment of teams into mega-conferences, which in turn will have major implications for bowl game affiliations, and even coveted BCS eligibility. If the Sooners and Cowboys end up joining the Pac-12 and that move makes no sense to many on a geographic level, just keep in mind that Texas Christian University — the recent Rose Bowl champs — are about to join the Big East. The new paradigm is that geography is hardly a constraint anymore when it comes to conference affiliation, and it’s all part of the brave new world of NCAA football realignment about to happen before our eyes. What we fans and observers of big-time college football thought were secure affiliations over the past 15 years have turned out to be anything but. Once again, the firm rule about nothing being static has held.