College Football Week 9 Awards October 29, 2012
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: Air Force, Arizona, Arkansas, Army, Auburn, Big 10, Big Ten, Bob Stoops, Brian Kelly, Bryant-Denny Stadium, Buffalo, Bulldogs, Butch Jones, Central Florida, Charlie Strong, Cincinnati, Clemson, cocktail party, college, Colorado, Crimson Tide, Dan Mullen, Danny Hope, Darrell Hazell, Duke, East Carolina, Fighting Illini, Florida, Florida State, football, Gators, Georgia, Hoosiers, Horned Frogs, Huskies, Illinois, Indiana, Joker Phillips, Kansas, Kansas State, Kent State, Kentucky, Kevin Sumlin, Kyle Flood, Louisville, LSU, Miami, Milan Puskar Stadium, Mississippi State, Missouri, N.C. State, Navy, NCAA, North Carolina, Northern Illinois, Notre Dame, Ohio, Ohio State, Ohio U, Oklahoma, Oregon, Oregon State, Purdue, Rutgers, SEC, SMU, Southern Miss, spread offense, Stanford, Steve Sarkesian, Tarheels, TCU, Temple, Tennessee, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, toilet bowl, Troy, Tulsa, UAB, UMass, USC< Alabama, Washington, West Virginia
add a comment
(Note: All rankings are current AP [post-week 9, pre-week 10] unless otherwise noted.)
COACHES
Wish I were him: Brian Kelly, Notre Dame
Glad I’m not him: Kyle Flood, Rutgers
Lucky guy: Charlie Strong, Louisville
Poor guy: Butch Jones, Cincinnati
Desperately seeking a clue: Joker Phillips, Kentucky
Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Darrell Hazell, Kent State
Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Bob Stoops, Oklahoma
Desperately seeking … anything: Danny Hope, Purdue
TEAMS
Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Oregon (beat Colorado 70-14)
Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: Texas (beat Kansas 21-17)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Auburn (lost to No. 16 Texas A&M 63-21)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t: Kansas (lost to Texas 21-17)
Thought you wouldn’t kick butt, you did: Navy (beat East Carolina 56-28)
Thought you wouldn’t get your butt kicked, you did: Texas Tech (lost to No. 3 Kansas State 55-24)
Dang, they’re good: Kansas State
Dang, they’re bad: Temple
Can’t stand prosperity: Ohio U. (lost to Miami [Ohio] 23-20)
Did the season start? Texas
Can the season end? Purdue
Can the season never end? Notre Dame
GAMES
Play this again: No. 7 Georgia 17, No. 8 Florida 9
Never play this again: No. 3 Oregon 70, Colorado 14
What? Michigan State 16, Wisconsin 13, OT
Huh? No. 10 Georgia 7, No. 8 Florida 9
Double Huh? Washington 20, No. 13 Oregon State 17
Are you kidding me? Kent State 35, Rutgers 23
Oh – my – God: Arizona 39, No 18 USC 36
Told you so: No. 12 Louisville 34, Cincinnati 30, OT
NEXT WEEK
Ticket to die for: No. 1 Alabama @ No. 6 LSU (notwithstanding No. 2 Oregon @ No. 9 USC)
Best non-Big Six vs. Big Six matchup: Tulsa @ Arkansas
Best non-Big Six matchup: SMU @ Central Florida
Upset alert: No. 10 Clemson @ Duke
Must win: Texas @ No. 20 Texas Tech
Offensive explosion: Arizona @ UCLA
Defensive struggle: Miami (Ohio) @ Buffalo
Great game no one is talking about: No. 16 Texas A&M @ No. 17 Mississippi State
Intriguing coaching matchup: Kevin Sumlin of Texas A&M vs. Dan Mullen of Mississippi State
Who’s bringing the body bags? Colorado @ No. 15 Stanford
Why are they playing? Troy @ Tennessee
Plenty of good seats remaining: UAB @ Southern Miss
They shoot horses, don’t they? UMass @ Northern Illinois
Week 9 in Review: Upsets and Conference Toilet Bowls Abound
The whole purpose of a given “Toilet Bowl” is to pit the two worst teams against each other to find which is, in fact, the worst of the worst. Such was determined twice yesterday. In the Big 10 Toilet Bowl, Indiana trounced Illinois 31-17, in the Fighting Illini’s home stadium, no less. Illinois, now 2-6, is now the undisputed – though clearly not undefeated – bottom-feeder of the conference for this season. They are winless in the Big 10, and have no time to lick this very revealing wound, as next week they venture into Columbus, Ohio to take on Ohio State.
Meanwhile, in the Toilet Bowl, SEC Edition, Missouri defeated Kentucky in CoMo (which is what the locals refer to as Columbia, Mo.) by a similar score, 33-10. Kentucky is in a sadly familiar spot in the most brutal of conferences in college football. What is even more revealing, though, is UK’s response in the wake of the loss.
“It’s tough, because we knew we were better than those guys,” so said Kentucky tailback Raymond Sanders. Better than them, even when losing by 23 points? Such denial of reality is why head coach Joker Phillips has merited the above award for the week (see: Desperately seeking a clue).
Undefeateds going down: Fewer teams remain undefeated today than when they woke up to play games yesterday. Rutgers was the highest-ranked team in the Big East before going down to one-loss Kent State. Inexplicably, the Golden Flashes’ sole defeat came at the hands of Kentucky.
Mississippi State’s first defeat of the season was the most understandable of all first losses of the year, given that they were going up against No. 1 Alabama, in Bryant-Denny Stadium, no less. The Bulldogs’ head coach, Dan Mullen, said it best going into the weekend when he pointed out that, “[Y]ou’ve got to try to run the ball (on Alabama) whether you’re having success or not.” Despite Mississippi State’s best efforts, they were very slowly and methodically ground down by the Crimson Tide, 38-7.
On the West Coast, undefeated Oregon State lost that distinction in their loss to Washington. Steve Sarkesian’s Huskies have earned the reputation of being a “giant killer” of sorts this year, as they handed previously-undefeated Stanford its first loss of the year as well. Keep an eye on the program on the rebound in Seattle.
Finally, Florida was another team to bite the proverbial dust and suffer its first loss to Georgia in the World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party in Jacksonville, Fla. Though scoring was relatively low (17-9 in favor of the UGA Bulldogs), there were plenty of plays to keep the crowd enthused. In the end, the old adage of “the team that makes the fewest mistakes wins” rang true yet again, which explains how the Bulldogs reigned victorious.
More chrome: North Carolina – of all bloody teams! – has jumped on the chrome dome bandwagon, as they sported chrome-silver helmets during their last-minute upset over rival N.C. State. Moreover, the main decal was an oversized Tarheel logo (the Carolina blue-colored foot with the tar on the heel), in breaking with the traditional “NC” decal they usually display. On all-dark blue jersey and pants ensemble complimented a very different look for a team normally known for its “Carolina blue” helmets and jerseys. Oh well: it beats the trendy “matte” look!
Choke-lahoma: That moniker was earned/demonstrated yet again last night, as Oklahoma squandered a golden (if you’ll pardon the expression) opportunity to hand Notre Dame its first loss of the year. Stoops and company have nobody to blame but themselves for deliberately holding themselves back. They had an offensive line capable of controlling the line of scrimmage, and yet they repeatedly passed up on the opportunity to establish a ground attack. On the passing side of things, they also held themselves back by concentrating on short-yardage increments that are the bread-and-butter of the one-sided spread offense. They did this while being thoroughly capable of throwing the ball further down the field, and by not doing this, never forced the Irish secondary to respect either the deep threat or the short yardage attempts. Head Coach Bob Stoops has proven once again to be something of a schoolyard bully of the coaching ranks; arrogant and blunt with reporters, lots of bluster, but having little to, er, “bring,” when genuinely challenged.
Looking ahead: some other games to keep an eye on, aside from the upcoming games listed above includes Air Force @ Army in an all-service academies showdown. Another intriguing matchup is TCU venturing into Morgantown, W.V. to play the Mountaineers. The big question going in to that game will be, how will West Virginia respond to two consecutive drubbings after being ranked so high in the polls? Moreover, how the Horned Frogs will handle the Milan Puskar Stadium crowd is a question no doubt in the back of the minds of many a fan and observer. In the wake of the SEC “Toilet Bowl” 2012, Missouri takes on Florida and Kentucky takes on Vanderbilt, meaning that the respective cellar-dweller status of either team is unlikely to change anytime soon. After Oklahoma was embarrassed at home to Notre Dame, how will they respond at Iowa State, a team that has shown surprising formidability this year? Can Duke show that it has staying power by bouncing back after a tough though understandable loss to Florida State in time to put up a good fight against inconsistent Clemson? More importantly, can USC bounce back from being upset in the desert by Arizona in time for a primetime showdown against Oregon at home?
College Football Week 8 Awards October 22, 2012
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: Alabama, Alamo Bowl, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Atlanta, Auburn, Baylor, BCS, Beavers, Big 12, Big XII, Bill Snyder, Bob Stoops, Boston College, Bowling Green, Brian Kelly, Bulldogs, Charlie Strong, Charlie Weis, chrome, Cincinnati, Civil War, cocktail, college, Colorado, Colorado State, Corvalis, Dana Holgorsen, Danny Hope, David Cutcliffe, Ducks, Duke, East Carolina, Eugene, Florida, Florida State, football, Gators, Georgia, Hawaii, helmet, Houston, Indiana, Iowa, Jacksonville, Jeff Driskel, Kansas, Kansas State, Kent State, Kentucky, Kyle Whittingham, Louisville, LSU, matte, Michigan, Michigan State, Mississippi State, Missouri, Mountaineers, Navy, NCAA, Nebraska, Nick Saban, no-huddle, North Carolina, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Orange Bowl, Oregon, outdoor, Pac-12, party, Purdue, Red Raiders, Rutgers, SEC, SMU, Sooners, South Carolina, Stanford, Steve Spurrier, TCU, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, The Swamp, Toledo, Tommy Tuberville, Urban Meyer, USC, Utah, West Virginia, Wildcats, Will Muschamp, Wisconsin
add a comment
(Note: All rankings are current AP [post-week 8, pre-week 9] unless otherwise noted.)
COACHES
Wish I were him: Bill Snyder, Kansas State
Glad I’m not him: Steve Spurrier, South Carolina
Lucky guy: Charlie Strong, Louisville
Poor guy: Danny Hope, Purdue
Desperately seeking a clue: Charlie Weis, Kansas
Desperately seeking a P.R. man: David Cutcliffe, Duke
Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Dana Holgorsen, West Virginia
Desperately seeking … anything: Kyle Whittingham, Utah
TEAMS
Thought you’d kick butt, you did: No. 10 USC (beat Colorado 50-6)
Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: No. 12 Georgia (beat Kentucky 29-24)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Kansas (lost to No. 8 Oklahoma 52-7)
Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t: Navy (beat Indiana 31-30)
Thought you wouldn’t get your butt kicked, you did: No. 17 South Carolina (lost to No. 3 Florida 44-11)
Dang, they’re good: Florida
Dang, they’re bad: Auburn
Did the season start? Iowa
Can the season end? Boston College
Can the season never end? Kansas State
GAMES
Play this again: No. 18 Texas Tech 56, TCU 53
Never play this again: No. 2 Oregon 43*, Arizona State 21
What? No. 4 Kansas State 55, No. 25 West Virginia 17
Huh? Duke 33, North Carolina 30
Are you kidding me? Toledo 29, Cincinnati 23
Oh – my – God: Navy 31, Indiana 30
NEXT WEEK
Ticket to die for: No. 5 Notre Dame @ No. 8 Oklahoma (notwithstanding Georgia vs. No. 3 Florida in Jacksonville)
Best non-Big Six vs. Big Six matchup: Kent State @ No. 18 Rutgers
Best non-Big Six matchup: Navy @ East Carolina
Upset alert: No. 13 Mississippi State @ No. 1 Alabama
Must win: No. 20 Michigan @ Nebraska
Offensive explosion: No. 15 Texas Tech @ No. 4 Kansas State
Defensive struggle: Missouri @ Kentucky
Great game no one is talking about: Cincinnati @ No. 16 Louisville, Friday, 8 PM
Intriguing coaching matchup: Bob Stoops of Oklahoma vs. Brian Kelly of Notre Dame
Who’s bringing the body bags? Colorado @ No. 2 Oregon
Why are they playing? UMass @ Vanderbilt
Plenty of good seats remaining: Hawaii @ Colorado St. (notwithstanding Indiana @ Illinois)
They shoot horses, don’t they? No. 22 Texas A&M @ Auburn
*If Oregon did not call off the dogs at halftime, they could have scored 86 points, not just 43.
Offensive Explosion, C-USA-style: Who’da thought that the Thursday night Houston-SMU matchup would have led to such offensive fireworks?
Two trends in helmet design: One of which is the matte epidemic that must be discussed in a future article, having infected teams such as TCU, Arkansas, Texas A&M, Baylor (their green helmets in the recent Alamo Bowl), Michigan State (sort of), and a host of others. But another emergent trend, one more becoming of ultra-modernity, is the “chrome” effect. Oregon debuted it during the most recent Rose Bowl, where they triumphed over Wisconsin wearing helmets with chrome [duck] wings on a chrome shell. Recently, they demolished Arkansas State with chrome [duck] wings on a plain yellow shell. Now, Michigan State has furthered the trend with a special helmet they wore in their narrow loss to rival Michigan, sporting a chrome-green shell with a silver chrome decal. Not bad!
Will Muschamp seems like “the guy” after all: “The guy,” meaning the guy who is capable of maintaining the high level of success that Florida fans have come to expect during the tenures of Steve Spurrier, followed indirectly by Urban Meyer. Having established his credentials as an excellent defensive coach while at Texas, Muschamp has finally carried that over into a smothering defense on the part of his current team. Indeed, the Gators have held opponents to just an average of roughly 12 points per game, and that includes a lackluster performance on both sides of the ball during their season-opener against Bowling Green. Offensively, the Gators have shown considerable signs of life, thanks in part to the able QB skills of one Jeff Driskel. On that side of the ball, Florida has averaged 33 points per game for the past five games. Fourteen points was enough to overcome LSU’s stingy ‘D,’ while the Gators put up a whopping 44 points on South Carolina’s reputable defense yesterday in The Swamp.
The “So What” for the SEC: If these shadows remain unchanged, it will be a Battle Royale in Atlanta between Florida and Alabama come early December. But first, Florida must take care of Georgia in the World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party in Jacksonville, while Alabama has to contend with undefeated Mississippi State. Bama also has LSU left on their slate, while the Gators’ only major challenge after the Bulldogs (UGA, not MSU) will be a regular-season closer at rival Florida State (thankfully for the Gators, a non-conference foe). Stay tuned!
The current race in the Big XII: Kansas State remains firmly in the driver’s seat after dispatching with yet another viable challenger in West Virginia. Geno Smith might very well be leading a high-powered offense, but the Mountaineers’ defense is clearly another matter entirely, one that Coach Dana Holgorsen would be well-served to shore up at some point. The challenge for head coach Bill Snyder and the Wildcats is to turn around after a big win against a formidable team on the road, and be ready for the same level of performance at home, as Tommy Tuberville’s Texas Tech Red Raiders are about to come calling. A loss on the part of KSU could make for a very rather muddled race for top spot in the conference.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma is determined to maintain its insurgent conference championship run, but a number of potential challenges remain with Oklahoma State, West Virginia, and TCU awaiting their respective confrontations. Having said that, Bob Stoops & Co. have the opportunity to get back into the national conversation, as No. 5 Notre Dame comes into Norman for the biggest challenge the Irish are likely to face the entire year. The season for both teams hangs in the balance.
Oregon, meanwhile, keeps motoring along up in the Pacific Northwest. The Ducks remain undefeated, and their scores have been so high, they have practically required oxygen to read them, averaging 51 points each game thus far. Their no-huddle offense is so fast-paced that it has caused Nick Saban of seemingly invincible Alabama to grumble. But it will not be a smooth road to Miami for the Ducks for the BCS title game. In two weeks, they must face resurgent USC. Just two weeks after that, Stanford will not be playing dead just because Oregon is, well, Oregon, and they close their regular season with in-state rival Oregon State in the annual match-up known as “The Civil War.” Given that the Beavers have crept into the No. 8 ranking, the game between these two teams this year could very well live up to such an august game title/nickname. Moreover, that game this year will be in Corvalis, not Eugene. If the Ducks end up making it to the Orange Bowl part II, they will certainly have earned it.
Bobby Petrino’s Potential Next Job(s) October 19, 2012
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Bill Belichick, Bob Stoops, Bobby Petrino, Browns, Cene Chizik, Cleveland, college, Commonwealth Stadium, Cotton Bowl, Crimson Tide, Florida, football, Fran Curci, Georgia, Joker Phillips, Kentucky, Mack Brown, Michigan State, NCAA, Nick Saban, Oklahoma, Oregon, Paul Freeman, Raiders of the Lost Ark, SEC, Texas, Texas A&M, USC, Vanderbilt, War Eagle, Will Muschamp, Winston Churchill
1 comment so far
The approximate half-way point in the college football regular season is upon us, and while many surprises and other developments surely await us fans, some coaches are already feeling the heat…the heat of the hotseat, that is! Deny it as they might, certain fanbases are restless, and already talking about who might replace their failing current head coach. One candidate that keeps emerging in water cooler conversation is none other than Bobby Petrino.
Yes, as mentioned in a previous blog entry, he is so mercenary as a coach that he gives other mercenaries a bad name, to borrow a line from Paul Freeman’s character in Raiders of the Lost Ark. But he wins, and has proven to do so at Louisville (taking the Cardinals to the Orange Bowl at the end of the 2006 season), and at Arkansas, making the program so strong as to merit a preseason top-ten ranking in the eyes of the voters. Had he not exhibited a horrible lapse in judgment in putting his mistress on the department payroll – to say nothing of having a mistress in the first place while being a married man – there is no telling what sort of memorable season the Razorbacks would be having right now.
A coach that can win like that, despite his baggage and his less-than-loyal track record, will surely have offers by season’s end. The teams that will likely extend that offer – the likelihood being of a considerable varying degree from team to team – are listed and explained as follows:
Kentucky: Despite his denials at SEC Media Days earlier this summer – denials of him “not feeling any heat” — Joker Phillips, as decent a man as he may be, is clearly in over his head as the coach of Kentucky’s program. Rich Brooks left the program in decent shape (actually, in very good shape by Kentucky’s standards), but Joker is a reminder of the inevitable program decay that follows when one promotes the long-time loyal assistant to the head man role instead of an ambitious outsider. In two-and-a-half seasons as head coach, Phillips has only managed to go 12-20. Given his geographical disadvantages (it is Kentucky, after all), and that UK plays in the SEC, any coach faces an uphill challenge. But the fans nevertheless have been understandably grumbling, as the empty seats in Commonwealth Stadium attest. Could Petrino be brought in to turn things around?
It’s Possible: Given how mercenary Petrino is, he could very well coach against Louisville. In a weird way, it would be somewhat fitting, given that his recruiting techniques were pioneered by Fran Curci, the head coach back in the late 1970s. Petrino himself perfected the recruiting technique (recruiting talented athletes that are potentially, er, troubled) by adding a new layer to the approach with his own, patented system of keeping the potential troublemakers in line and on a short leash.
It’s Impossible: Joker’s current salary is $1.7 million a year. Not bad, but Petrino would expect a lot more to make up for the fact that his team will take a back seat to basketball team due to the UK faithful’s perpetually misplaced priorities. The bigger problem, though, is in Petrino’s skill set. The program will be in something of a mess. Some head coaches are skilled at being turnaround CEOs (think: Steve Spurrier, or, more to the point, Howard Schnellenberger; in the pros, think: Bill Parcells). But turnaround CEOs do not always do well long-term because their skillset is turning a struggling program around into a respectable one, in good working order. Petrino’s skillset is that of a caretaker CEO; taking programs that are already in decent working order and tweak them slightly to gradually make them better and better. It is not proven that he can take a program struggling as badly as Kentucky is and take them to where Arkansas was prior to his sudden ouster.
Alabama: Try not to laugh. Yes, Nick Saban continues to solidify his bona fides as one of the best coaches in the business while the Crimson Tide is on course to vie for yet another national title. But there is a potential drawback in this. Saban is so good in part because he is highly aspirational, and highly aspirational people get bored very easily. One more national championship, and it is quite likely that Saban will be looking for a new challenge, either another program to rehab, or a franchise if he chose to go back to the pros. Keep in mind that he built his reputation as a capable coach under Bill Belichick with the Cleveland Browns, before he left the defensive coordinator job there to become the new head coach of Michigan State back in 1995. Not only might he get bored after winning yet another national title, but he could also be sick of dealing with the insane fans and boosters, having to recruit all the time, and not being able to go to the grocery store for fear of getting mobbed by a fanbase that has been known to love its program to death. All these things ought to be kept in mind.
It Could Happen: Timing, in this case, is everything. If Saban leaves after this year, and Petrino does not have many more appealing choices, this could work. Alabama has demonstrated they are willing to pay top dollar for the best coaching talent and will commit whatever resources the circumstances require to be a perennial championship contender. It could work, if certain potential developments first occur.
It Ain’t Gonna Happen: As ambitious as Petrino is, does he really want to coach in what has been acknowledged to be the biggest pressure cooker in all of football, college or pro? His ambition would surely be put to the test with such a job. Aside from that, the timing could be bad. Saban might not leave for newer challenges after this year, assuming he does so at all any time soon. Petrino is not going to hold his breath while other programs might come calling.
Auburn: Don’t laugh. Sure, Gene Chizik is only two seasons removed from winning the BCS national championship in a thrilling game against Oregon. But he is only 1-5 thus far this season. Football fans in the Yellowhammer State, either pro-Tide or pro-Tiger, will not stand for such a disgrace. As Doug Gillett of EDSBS reminds us, Winston Churchill, one of history’s greatest statesmen, was given the pink slip by British voters just 58 days after the Allies’ victory over Nazi Germany. Auburn already courted Petrino on the sly before while the mercenary coach did his stint at Louisville. He was the offensive coordinator before deciding to lead the Cardinals starting in 2003. His ties to the loveliest little village on the Plains is thus well-established.
It’s Possible: Only if Chizik sets a new record for the quickest time a coach is fired after winning a national championship. He already has been [ahem] ‘awarded’ as “Desperately seeking….ANYTHING” in the CFB Week 7 Awards. The upcoming Vandy game is, at this rate, a toss-up, and Texas A&M, Georgia and Alabama remain on the schedule. Will the War Eagle faithful countenance a potential 4-8 year? If not, guess whom they might call.
It’s not Possible: Only if the above scenario of ousting Chizik after only two years when we won the whole darn thing does not come to fruition, and be mindful that it would set a new record/precedent if it did.
Texas: Let’s face it; Mack Brown’s record against hated rival Oklahoma is spotty at best. The Sooners have to recruit Texas in order to be successful. This template dates back to the days of Bud Wilkinson (!). The Longhorns have the built-in advantage of, well, already being there. The University of Texas is THE flagship school/program of the biggest, best football state in the entire U.S. of A. They have the pick of the litter; first dibs on the cream of the crop. Yet they were given a 63-21 butt-whipping at the hand of Bob Stoops’ Sooner squad in the Cotton Bowl this past week. Losing to a high-powered West Virginia team was one thing, but losing this badly to Oklahoma is too bitter a pill to swallow for the Texas fans, as thoroughly decent and gracious a man as he may be (indeed, on that front, one of the classiest acts in the business.)
It Could Happen: If enough movers and shakers in Longhorn Nation think that the game has passed Mack Brown by, a vacancy will open. If enough of said movers and shakers are committed to the idea of never allowing such a loss to Oklahoma to happen on their watch, guess whom they might call. If they do, the potential upside is tremendous. As things currently stand, the team is not a mess, just short on playmakers. With Petrino at the helm, the Horns could become an overnight juggernaut that would give Stoops and Co. in Norman, Okla., more than cause for notice.
It Couldn’t Happen: There is a great duality to Longhorns fans. Yes, they care very, very deeply, but unlike the Alabama faithful, they have something called “lives.” This gives them perspective on things that other devoted fans sometimes lack, and might not call for Mack Brown’s gentle ouster until things could get worse. Again, as mentioned before, Petrino is not exactly a man to hold his breath, even for the best job in all of college football (along with USC).
(Addendum 10-21-21) Tennessee: One reader very simply commented, “Tennessee?” Such an obvious suggestion, and it makes me kick myself in the pants for not adding this [theoretical] possibility to the list in the first place. So what about it? The Volunteers are current 3-4, having just lost to Alabama, arguably their most hated rival in a conference that is certainly full of them, to varying degrees. Earlier in the year, the Vols blew the game against Florida, seemingly a winnable contest at the time. The loss to Georgia may be understandable, but losing to Mississippi State is still a hard one to swallow, no matter how much improved the Bulldogs are. To say that Derek Dooley is on the hot seat is therefore an understatement, and it will not get any easier next week, as they must a South Carolina team looking to get well on them — in Columbia, no less! Make no mistake about it, the Volunteer Nation is grumbling, and a potential 7-5 year will not necessarily pacify them.
It might happen: Already plenty of Tennessee fans are calling for Dooley’s head on a plate, and let us not forget that he was essentially a stop-gap/default hire after Lane Kiffin’s sudden departure. Of all the coaches in the SEC, Dooley might be on just as thin ice as Joker Phillips at Kentucky. If the ice were to break, it is not much of a stretch of the imagination as to whom AD Dave Hart might call. Tennessee has the resources to pay Petrino a competitive salary; the tradition, fan base, and resources are there to make it a “destination job,” and he would no doubt get the administrative support he would need.
It might not happen: Only if the fan base and administration are happy with another [potential] 7-5 season and a mediocre-to-lower tier bowl game.
Other (very) longshots: Forget Arkansas; no way they will re-hire someone whom they fired for egregious indiscretions in the first place. Florida might have been on people’s radar screens as a potential job opening, as the fans and media alike were not, for a while, sold on Will Muschamp as their guy. But he seems to have righted the ship this year with a very stingy defense and improved QB play, meaning that he could be Gator Nation’s guy after all. Organizationally, Petrino would be a good fit for Florida, and would kick butt like nobody’s business, but things are currently going fine in Gainesville, at least for this year. If any of you dear readers would like to speculate on where else BP could end up, please offer your thoughts in the comment section!
Whither the conferences in major college football? September 8, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: ACC, Big 8, Big East, Big Ten, Big XII, Colorado, conferences, football, Jupiter, Miami, NCAA, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, SEC, solar system, Southeastern Conference, static, SWC, Texas, Texas A&M, Virginia Tech
2 comments
When I teach my course in American government at my community college in Louisville, one thing I have taken to doing early in the course’s term is to hand out a sheet to each student with a list of important rules in physics/economics. My rationale for this is to get the students thinking about the potential consequences of certain actions on the part of government. One such rule I lay out for them is thus: “Nothing is static.” Just try to disprove that rule. After all, nothing is static in the economy, nothing is static in our own interpersonal relationships, the climate is certainly not static — regardless of what the enviro-socialists want us to think — and indeed, nothing is static in the Solar system, not with variations in solar radiation output that have implications for the temperatures on this planet as well as for Mars and the Gallilean satellites around Jupiter.
The recent announcement that Texas A&M will depart the Big XII Conference for the Southeastern Conference come June of next year has reminded me of this rule once again. Though this is not the first move of a D-1A (pardon me, Football Bowl Subdivision) school to shake things up a bit regarding conference affilition, this one move could open the floodgates for radical conference realignment, the likes of which none of us have seen in our lifetime.
Most moves up to this point seemed fairly self-contained. When the Southwest Conference folded after 1995, the top four teams in that conference joined the Big 8, thus giving birth to the Big XII. The other four teams disbersed, many initially ending up in Conference USA, which banded together lots of erstwhile mid-majors and independents. The arrangement within the Big XII was one that on paper made geographic sense, at least longitudinally (much like the erstwhile Pac-10), with Nebraska the anchoring power in the north, and Texas the anchoring power in the south. Furthermore, should Texas have a down year, Oklahoma was eventually strong enough to fill that power gap on the southern end.
The switch-ups we witnessed earlier last decade did not seem to portend major realignment, either. The only thing that Miami, Virginia Tech, and Boston College bolting from the Big East to the Atlantic Coast Conference amounted to was to question whether or not the former still deserved to have a berth in the BCS bowl games.
All that was put in jeopardy with Nebraska bolting for the Big Ten after last season. Less consequential was Colorado moving to join the Pac-10, now the Pac-12. As things currently stand, the Big Ten now has 12 teams, and the Big XII has been reduced to nine, or at least will be with the Aggies’ imminent departure. This current state of affairs raises two simultaneous possibilities. For one, many thought that even though the Cornhuskers left for the Big Ten, the Big XII could still limp on, possibly even bring in new up-and-coming teams to fill the void left by the Huskers and the Buffaloes. With A&M soon to leave, the death knell for the Big XII has been all but sounded. Even though, at this moment, Oklahoma and Texas both remain, and Oklahoma State would add increasing credibility, given their up-and-coming status (thank you, T. Boone Pickens), the gradual disintegration of the conference, first at the northern end and now at the southern end leaves many to conclude that more dominos shall inevitably fall.
One such departure has already pushed Southeastern Conference membership to a future number of 13. Further speculation has been fueled as to whom else the SEC might court. Already, conferences such as the Pac-12 have been making major overtures for the Sooners and the Cowboys to join them. The Longhorns are an even more juicy target for conferences as well, though UT, what with its special brand and its own sports channel in the newly-created Longhorn Network, has the prestige, winning tradition, not to mention geographic advantages to be successful as an independent. Indeed, what we may be witnessing is Texas becoming the Notre Dame of the 21st Century in terms of athletic prestige, winning tradition, privileged status, and ability to attract top recruits.
But, in returning to the point of the SEC’s burgeoning membership, 13 could be a magic number, magic in the sense that it creates the possibly for that number to grow further, not just for the southeastern juggernaut power, but for conferences elsewhere. As mentioned earlier, the possibility persists that Oklahoma and Oklahoma State could end up in the Pac-12, bumping their lucky number up to fourteen. Moreover, it is not inconceivable that Texas could join that new mega-conference as well. USC plus the Sooners plus the Longhorns equals one formidable conference indeed. Iowa State could end up following suit in a different sense by joining the Big Ten (Nebraska is already there, and in-state rival Iowa has been a long-time member). Geographically, that theoretical move is quite logical. Where Kansas, Kansas State, Baylor, Missouri and Texas Tech might end up — again, should the dominoes continue to fall — is anybody’s guess, though the Mizzou Tigers might end up joining the Big Ten as well. That possibility has been broached several times before, in fact. My only reservation against that is, can one conference abide three different teams whose colors are (officially) Old Gold & Black?
While there could be a scramble for a would-be disintegrated Big XII’s table scraps, the Southeastern Conference might try to bring in other powers to join their juggernaut league (Florida State and Virginia Tech have been listed as possibilities). Might such a conference cannibalization prompt the ACC and the Big East to join forces? Given that Texas A&M has turned its back on its long-time rivals and all-too willingly allowed itself to be used by the SEC, perhaps all of us ought to rethink what is possible.
The bottom line in all of these prognostications is that we could be witnessing a radical realignment of teams into mega-conferences, which in turn will have major implications for bowl game affiliations, and even coveted BCS eligibility. If the Sooners and Cowboys end up joining the Pac-12 and that move makes no sense to many on a geographic level, just keep in mind that Texas Christian University — the recent Rose Bowl champs — are about to join the Big East. The new paradigm is that geography is hardly a constraint anymore when it comes to conference affiliation, and it’s all part of the brave new world of NCAA football realignment about to happen before our eyes. What we fans and observers of big-time college football thought were secure affiliations over the past 15 years have turned out to be anything but. Once again, the firm rule about nothing being static has held.
The Aggies to the SEC? September 5, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: Big 12 conference, Big XII, football, Longhorn Network, media market, SEC, Southeastern, Texas A&M
2 comments
After much speculation and rumor, it is official. Texas A&M is about to leave the Big XII (minus 2) for the SEC. My overall assessment is the A&M is getting used, and seems to be alright with such an arrangement. Indeed, the overall reason for the Aggies’ seemingly hasty move to the Southeastern Conference is one that remains a mystery, including the fairly humorous and insightful sports columnist Jerome Solomon of the Houston Chronicle. Perhaps the haste in arranging this new affiliation can be attributed in large part to the Aggies’ pique at the perception that rival UT got a sweetheart deal by being allowed to establish their own television sports network. In case you’ve been living under a rock for the past year, the new, exclusive channel in question is the Longhorn Network .
To me, the SEC has more to gain from this arrangement than A&M has to gain in return. The Southeastern Conference is acting as though Texas A&M is the most wonderful of additions, and from their standpoint, why not? This move benefits the incumbent schools in the conference in that it gives those programs a much wider in-road to recruit Texas, the greatest football state in the country (indeed, on so many levels, it is the greatest state, period). On that plane of thinking, this move makes a lot of sense. Why shouldn’t one of the flagship schools of the greatest football state in the land be a part of the greatest college football conference? Furthermore, by bringing in A&M to the SEC, the conference has the golden opportunity to open up new media markets, particularly the oh-so-juicy Dallas and Houston markets. The Atlanta market is all well and good, but beyond that, the Jacksonville, Tampa-St. Pete, Birmingham and Nashville markets will only take you so far. With Dallas and Houston, the number of eyeballs you can attract to watch the games on TV — not to mention your potential advertising revenue — has been taken to a whole new level. Oh, and did I mention that more SEC teams can now recruit Texas more heavily?
All these previously noted things are great for the conference itself, but what about the newcomer? The sad state of things is that Texas A&M might very well be getting the short end of the stick. Sure, the SEC acts like they love A&M like the Aggies have never been loved before, and are being welcomed into said conference with open arms. But once the Aggies become a full-fledged member, they shall instantly take a back seat to the majority of teams. As things currently stand, A&M has the potential to compete in the upper echelon of the Big XII (again, minus two) with Texas, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State. They might even win one of those games, maybe more. But once in the SEC, their level of talent will be below that of Arkansas, and Mississippi State is no gimme, not anymore, at least (not with Dan Mullen doing such a great job in strengthening the program). From there, the rest of the competition only gets more intense. In so many words, for the foreseeable future, A&M shall be relegated to the lower half of their new conference home.
Then there’s recruiting. Already A&M has been losing out on the most prestigious recruits to the Longhorns and the Sooners. Now they must compete for recruits with half of the SEC, possibly more. Fighting Oklahoma State, Texas, and Oklahoma for recruits is difficult enough, but this latest move has opened the floodgates for Alabama, LSU, Georgia, and a host of others to come knocking at those same recruits’ doors. Congrats, A&M: you have just made recruiting your in-state talent all the more difficult.
Given that the SEC will gain more than A&M from this arrangement when all is said and done, it looks as though the Aggies are letting themselves be used. But given how hastily A&M rushed into this conference switcheroo, it seems as though they were only too willing to allow for that. Hence the confusion on the part of many in the media.
Purdue debuts new football uniforms August 7, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: black, Boilermakers, Boilers, college athletics, college sports, design, DIN, football, gold, helmet, marketing, Nike, Purdue, Purdue football, tradition, uniforms
add a comment
As a former student manager for the Purdue football team, I, along with a handful of other lucky souls, have more than intimate knowledge about Boilermaker football uniforms, and college football equipment in general. Needless to say, whenever I receive news of a total redesign of the Boilers’ gridiron game unis, my interest is more than a little engaged. At first glance of this redesigned series of gameday garments, part of me says “neat!” while the other part of me says “what on Earth were they thinking?” First off, I get it. Young players these days love the latest and greatest football fashions. It’s the marketing, stupid, and fresh uni designs have been smartly used as a recruiting tool these days. Hey, it worked for Oregon. Meanwhile, has Penn State gotten this memo? Will they ever?
Before further discussions proceed, a full gallery of the new Purdue uniforms can be seen via this link.
First of all, here is what I like, either sort of, or all the way. Let’s start with the numbers, which I sort of like. Of all the number designs, do I find this font to be the most aesthetically pleasing? No, I do not. Frankly, the traditional jersey numbers have worked just fine for traditional powers such as Texas, Alabama, Oklahoma, LSU, Georgia, Ohio State, and so on, so part of me asks, ‘what makes Purdue so special?’ That being said, the press release on Purdue’s athletics website points out that these numbers are in the “DIN” font, a typeface first developed in 1923, and since the mid-Twenties has been adopted as the standard font for engineering applications. It also became the typeface of choice for metal stencil applications in trainyards. Seeing things along those lines, the engineering and train connection to the DIN font makes this a very appropriate choice. Plus, a font that’s almost 80 years old, when applied in a new way (new jerseys) can still look current; further proof that what is old is new.
Speaking of the numbers, another thing I love about the new design is the all-gold numbers on the black home jersey. Those familiar with earlier eras of Purdue football will no doubt recall that “back in the day,” Purdue had a long-standing history displaying gold numbers on black jerseys. Iconic photos of players in the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, as well as the 1960s attest to this (check out some of the photos of Bob Griese and Mike Phipps as Boilermakers, and you shall see what I mean!). While that started to change in the 1970s and espeically in the 1980s with the introduction of white numbers on Purdue’s black jerseys, gold numbers were still not unheard of as recently as the ’90s, but have been no more for about 14 years, until now. Kudos to whomever had them brought back, as they are a nice, throwback touch.
Dare I say, I also applaud the choice to go back to a plain black stripe on the helmets. To be sure, white and thin double-black stripes were a unique touch, one that was without precedence when Coach Tiller had them implemented on his new design (that template essentially being a carbon-copy of his Wyoming uni template, one that he transplanted with him in 1997). But the single black stripe on the gold helmet again speaks to some of Purdue’s glory days, such as the ’60s and the Mollenkopf era — another nice, traditional touch.
Now on to the more unpleasant matters. Let us start with the stripes. To preempt any misunderstandings, I am very happy that stripes stayed on the pants. I abhorred the 1990s fashion trend of stripe-less pants, and I am glad to see that we in the football community have moved on, with some exceptions. What I do not like is how the stripes changed. I absolutely loved our thin, double-stripe pattern. It was a direct throwback to our older styles of uniforms from the 1940s through the 1960s. The black pants with the gold stripes looked like an army general’s dress uniform — very classy. Plus, we, along with Alabama, were the only teams to use such stripes. I understand that times they are a-changin’, but if marketing is going to modify the stripes on the pants, can they at least have the decency to make sure those stripes are complete? These new stripes fail to go all the way up the pants, for goodness sake!
In another matter, there is no earthly reason why Purdue should ever be wearing white pants. Ever. Period. The only time I would condone it is if we had a black road helmet to provide the proper aesthetic contrast, say, a black helmet with a metallic gold “P” and a metallic gold 1-inch center stripe. Then the get-up wouldn’t look half-bad — for a road uniform, at least. In the meantime, though, my advice is, forget the white pants ever happened, and stick with the black pants on the road.
One recurring issue that nobody seems willing to address is the terrible shade of gold to which Purdue has been chained in recent years. A simple looking up of our official school colors will show the inquisitive individual that Purdue’s school colors are Old Gold and Black. Got that? Old Gold and Black. Sadly, the last time the Boilers had a real, old gold in their helmets was 1996, and the last time their pants were the genuine old gold was 1995, Mike Alstott’s senior year. Since 1997, the gold in Purdue’s pants has been a watered-down, urine-specimen shade of gold, and it’s downright pathetic. The ghastly pale shade is made all the more evident when mated with the white road jersey. One would have hoped that a total redesign of uniform would have given occasion to rectify this problem. Yet nothing has been done about this glaring weakness.
Whether the marketing wing of Purdue’s athletic department is at fault for consciously picking this sickly shade of gold, or Nike is being a less-than-responsive provider in imposing a one-size-fits-all shade of gold on all its clientele that use that hue, or both, the bottom line is that it remains unacceptable. Check out UCLA’s gold pants some time. They still have a substantive gold in their uniforms, which is proof positive that the proper shade is available. Get it together, you guys.
The Worst, Good, and Best College Football Helmets July 20, 2011
Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.Tags: color, design, equipment, football, helmet, style
6 comments
Nothing is as iconic to a program as the look of its helmet. It is what people are most apt to recognize when watching a team on TV, and is, by and large, the enduring symbol of the program, and, to some people, it is what comes to mind when the very school is mentioned. For example, when Notre Dame is mentioned, who does not think of the plain golden shells? Mention Michigan, and everyone is apt to think of the dark blue helmets with the distinct yellow patterns.
But as any discerning fan could tell you, not all helmet designs are created equally. Some look so-s0, some look far better, and others need a re-design faster than you can snap the ball after a hard count. After years of observation, I have come up with my own list of the helmets that merit distinction over others. So below are listed the worst, the good, and the best (what, you thought I’d be using the “good, bad and the ugly” cliche?)
The Worst:
Penn State: Yes, I’ve read other sports blogs that have actually ranked this helmet as one of the best-looking in college football. (Pause) Needless to say, those guys need their heads examined. The whole Penn State uniform is a waste, starting with the helmet. It needs that oblong-shaped Nittany Lion logo on each side in the worst way. As it is, the helmet is a symbol of a larger problem with the program, and indeed with the entire state. Joe Grand-Pa and Pennsylvania are both clinging to a glorious past that is becoming an increasingly fading memory. A changing of the guard and of head coach — and deciding to the join the late 20th Century with a helmet decal would show that they’re no longer living in the ‘was’ and are finally living in the ‘is.’
Oregon “graphite” helmet: I hear this design appeals to young people. I’m still young, but I suppose not young enough. Moreover, I cannot believe that the team chose this helmet over their beautiful green helmets when butting heads with Auburn in the BCS National Championship game. They deserved to lose on those grounds alone.
TCU “pewter” helmet: I have nothing against pewter. In fact, I think it looks pretty sweet as part of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ ensemble. But this is way over the line. It looks like the T-1000 nemesis from the movie “Terminator 2” threw up all over them. Worse yet, there’s no sign of the horned lizard on the decal. The program has those beautiful purple helmets, and yet they have worn these monstrosities? What in the name of Sammy Baugh and Davey O’Brien is this world coming to?
The Good (the best honorable mentions):
North Carolina: Few college helmets rock the Carolina blue. Only one, to the best of my knowledge, does so at the D-1A (pardon me, the FBS) level. Plus, UNC has, for a long time, used a tasteful among of dark blue trim, and the NC brand decal looks like its the perfect size.
California: Given that dark blue is my favorite color, I confess to have a bias in favor of such a shell color. But the Chicago Bears helmets are dark blue, and yet those helmet look generic as all get-out. Indeed, there are two things that give Cal’s helmet nice aesthetics. One, its dark blue is a very, very fine metallic. Two, if you look closely enough, the yellow-gold “Cal” decal is govered in metallic gold glitter. It’s a nice combination.
Purdue: As any marketing consultant will tell you, if you want your product to look prestigious, make it black and gold. Behold, Exhibit A. If only the gold were a little darker to make it more commensurate with “Old Gold.” In years past, that was indeed the case. That said, can a “P” logo look any neater?
Louisville: Where to begin? The Cardinal mascot/nickname manifests itself in a number of different leagues, not just U of L: Ball State, Illinois State, St. Louis in MLB and Arizona in the NFL. That said, none of them come close to the best-looking Cardinal logo: that distinction belongs to Louisville. Its red facemask during the Bobby Petrino (and, regrettably, the Steve Kragthorpe) eras provided the wonderful contrast to the white shell, so it was a shame the Charlie Strong switched to the white facemask upon his inauguration as U of L’s current chief executive. To be sure, though, his introduction of the black and red triple centerstripes was an improvement over the tapering red centerstripe that they replaced. If Coach Strong brought back the red grilles, he would achieve perfection of that design. FYI: look closely at a U of L helmet, and you shall see that the white shell is (or, at least was) covered in silver glitter, topped off with clearcoat.
Hawaii: Can a metallic green be any darker and still be green? That alone gives it a considerable cool factor. Moreover, the Tapa-inspired “H” decal is most appropriate for the university and geographic setting, and who is not mesmerized by the elaborate pattern in the center stripe? As an aside, the silver road helmets were a mistake. All green, all the time, is the only way to go for the [erstwhile Rainbow] Warriors.
LSU: Some teams prefer the use of a single letter or two or three for their decal. Others prefer a pictorial depiction of the team nickname. The Bayou Bengals are one of the very few that do both, and do so with a basic helmet pattern (yellow-gold shell, purple and white triple center stripes) that has remained unchanged since 1956.
Boise State: The metallic royal blue shell makes this stand out. The orange time on the decal makes for a nice, aesthetically complementary appearance. To be sure, it was a mistake for the program to switch over to gray facemasks, as the white ones provided a much better contrast.
Florida: Given that I have included Boise State in this list of honorable mentions on the grounds that their blue and orange are textbook “complementary colors,” it is only logical I include the Gators’ bright orange helm as a contrast yet on the same grounds.
UCLA: Possibly the nicest color of gold in all of college football.
USC: I’ll be the first to admit, perhaps the Trojans’ fine tradition might have something to do with this mentioning. But that aside, Southern Cal’s cardinal color does the helmet a heap of justice, and with the recent addition of a thin, fine metallic top coat, it looks even “deeper” during night games.
Florida State: The Seminoles have traditionally sported a nice-looking metallic gold on their helmets, and my generation has grown up associating the garnet and white spearhead with some of the highest levels of modern success. If only their gold still looked like it does in the left-hand photo, then they would have the nicest gold of any football helmet, hands down.
Northwestern: To be sure, this photo does the helmet design zero justice. The television screen, in my experience, gives the same meager result. NWU’s helmet must be seen in person to be truly appreciated. Its base, cast-in color of the shell is actually black. The metallic purple pearl and candy coat gives it the deepest purple of which one could conceive, and the black facemask brings out the purple all the more. Besides, if you’re going to use the letter “N” for a logo, does the Wildcats’ N get any better (I ask rhetorically)?
Georgia: Straight red with no frills, and possibly the best-looking “G” logo in the business. The single, white centerstripe is the same as it was when the program debuted this overall design in 1964.
Cincinnati: Do not be fooled. This is not just another black helmet, oh no. Having seen one of these shells up close and personally, this is actually one of the most uniquely-colored helmets in all of football. Picture this: a black shell, lightly covered in red glitter, topped off with a red candy coat for good measure. Though that color combo is difficult to discern on TV, in person, you cannot take your eyes off it, it looks that cool.
South Carolina: Normally when a team switches from a colored shell to a white shell, my standard reaction is that whoever came up with that idea needs his head examined. To further augment the irony, prior to Lou Holtz’s arrival, the Gamecocks already had a nice-looking helmet with their garnet shall. But when one sees things in toto, combined with the knowledge that South Carolina has had the same garnet and black triple center stripe pattern since 1956, it all makes for a very attractive package indeed. Plus, the “C” logo is quite elaborate.
The Best:
Oregon: The Ducks did a heckuva job when they unveiled this new helmet design for the 1999 season; in so doing, they set a precedent for what to expect out of early 21st Century helmet design. Their metallic green is perhaps the most intriguing of that color in all of college football, and the ultra-modern-looking, yellow “O” provides just the right contrast. It is a wonder they even bother with their white, yellow, black and “graphite” helmets at all. What were they thinking not wearing these green babies against Auburn?
Ohio State: By itself, it’s a rather generic design, to be sure. Covered in Buckeyes, it’s one of the most sublime looks in college football. It has gotten only better within the past ten years. What used to be a generic fine silver coat has given way to something much neater: A heavy silver base coat, combined with a topping of silver glitter, sealed with clear coat, making a very “deep” silver look. The Buckeyes have set the standard for silver helmets in all of football, college or pro.
San Diego State: What, the purists ask? Why this peasant amongst traditional powers’ royalty? The answer is simple: the Aztecs have a distinct metallic red that makes it unique in college football, to say nothing of aesthetically pleasing. My best guess as to their secret? Possibly a black base shell, painted a gold-tinged metallic, then topped off with a red candy coat. It’s a viewing pleasure.
Arkansas: The Razorbacks themselves have a red (technically it’s “Cardinal” like that of USC, Iowa State, even Wisconsin) all their own, giving them arguably the most distinctive red-based shell in the game. Given that they now have one of the best coaches in the business with Bobby Petrino, chances are more folks will pay attention to this distinct helmet in the near future.
Texas: Normally, a plain white helmet with a white facemask is the epitome of generic in my book. But in this case, the iconic Longhorn silhouette logo provides an excellent contrast, one that gives the white shell and white grille a very clean look. Hook ’em!
TCU: This helmet is listed for the same reasons that I previously listed Northwestern’s helmet, and then some. The reason I rank it higher than NWU’s is thus: does it get any better than a silver-colored horned lizard on a deep purple helmet? I submit ‘no.’
Kentucky: Probably the most beautiful blue helmet in football, of any league. It is almost enough to make you forget that most UK fans have their priorities out of whack, what with their fixation on basketball.
Alabama: What other legendary football program can take small numbers, put them on the side of the helmet, and call that a fashion statement? Granted, Bama was not the first with this feature, but they are the ones who have become the best-known for it. That, plus the crimson helmet and gray facemask combo never goes out of style. The Alabama helmet is a reminder that, like wearing a nice tuxedo, true elegance comes in the form of simplicity, not flamboyance.
Michigan: Nothing beats the unique patten of the Michigan helmet. It is, arguably, the very symbol of the whole Wolverine athletics department, if not the university itself. Michigan’s hockey team uses this same patten on their hockey helmets. The football team’s truck has a custom paint job with this famous pattern on the top of the cab. I was not even ten years old when I first saw these helmets while watching Michigan play USC in the 1990 Rose Bowl. Fritz Crisler was said to have brought this pattern with him from Princeton and introduced it to the program in 1938. In all actuality, though, it is an innovation, not on outright invention. This famous pattern is actually a combination of certain styling queues already prevalent in the 1930s. Some teams had the “wing” on their helmets, while others used the three lines on their helmets in the ’30s and the ’40s. Even more fascinating is how the pattern is applied. The shell itself is actually that pale yellow (supposedly in line with the “maize” part of Michigan’s colors of Maize and Blue). A stencil pattern is applied, and the ultra-dark blue paint (perhaps the darkest blue in college football) is sprayed over it, followed by removal of said stencil. Voila — instant iconic helmet.
Ole Miss: Granted, this is not likely to be given a top-ten spot in most people’s helmet rankings. As I confessed earlier, though, I am naturally biased towards dark blue helmets. But so what? There are a number of them: what make Ole Miss so special? To me, nothing is better than dark blue with red trim. This helmet has that in spades, and carries a genteel tradition befitting legends such as Archie Manning and Johnny Vaught. It might be a quirky pick to some, but it works for me!
Coulda’, Woulda’, Shoulda’
Some teams used to have great-looking helmets, but have since tried to out-think the room and changed what were good things into not-so-great-looking things.
Indiana: The one on the right is what they used to have. Granted, the metallic crimson is quite pretty, before and after. But whereas the “before” had a matching crimson facemask and some nice white center stripes to provide a certain contrast, the “after” now looks like a cheap knock-off of Oklahoma.
Boston College: To be fair, there are many things to like about this helmet. Maroon and gold is always a winning combination, especially if the gold in question is of the metallic nature. The maroon center stripe and facemask provide a nice contrast, too. The problem? That’s all there is: without a decent decal on the side, it is a grossly incomplete design. A suggested solution to this problem would be to come up with a decal that is a combination of the “BC” logo with an eagle in the middle. Do that, and the design would merit a spot among the honorable mentions. Do it not, and the helmet remains an incomplete design and never lived up to its potential.
Michigan State: In recent years, the Spartans have had a really nice-looking metallic green. Moreover, take out 2001-2002 (where Bobby Williams foolishly went back to the generic “S” decal), and MSU has had an awesome Spartan helmet profile decal since 1995. A nice metallic green just the right hint of blue, an awesome Spartan decal, and a white center stripe made for a nice-looking helmet design, one that would have merited some sort of ranking. Not anymore, not with making the green darker, which detracts from the aesthetic, nor with the obtrusive tapering white centerstripe.
SMU: On the right is what the Mustangs had from 2004 to 2007. During that time, they had one of the nicest-looking shells in the game. Then somebody (I suspect June Jones, when he took over as head coach) got the bright idea to switch over to white helmets. Perhaps he wanted to hark back to the program’s glory days of the 1980s (pre-death penalty, at least). Whatever his intent may have been, the white helmet is come-down compared to the dark blue. Oh well…at least they got the royal blue and red center stripe combo right on the white shell. Give them credit for that.
Do any of you dear readers think I am leaving any out? Sound off in the comments section. I would enjoy your reading your thoughts.












































