jump to navigation

College Football Week 13 Awards November 30, 2015

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment
CFB-Oklahoma-Sooners-running-back-Samaje-Perine-smaller

The Bedlam Series between OU and OKST was supposed to be one of the best games of the week but it turned out to be a rout instead.  Photo by Mark J. Rebilas, USA Today Sports

(Note:  All rankings are current CFP [week 13] unless otherwise noted.)

 

COACHES

Wish I were him: Mark Dantonio, Michigan State

Glad I’m not him: Jim Harbaugh, Michigan

Lucky guy: Gary Patterson, TCU

Poor guy:  Art Briles, Baylor

Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Mike Riley, Nebraska

Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Jeff Brohm, Western Kentucky

Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Mike Gundy, Oklahoma State

Desperately seeking … anything:  Chad Morris, SMU

TEAMS

Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Memphis (see below)

Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: Oregon (defeated Oregon State 52-42)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Central Florida (lost to South Florida 44-3)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t:  South Carolina (lost to No. 1 Clemson 37-32)

Thought you wouldn’t kick butt, you did:  Western Kentucky (defeated Marshall 49-28)

Dang, they’re good: Ohio State

Dang, they’re bad:  Purdue

Can’t Stand Prosperity:  Oklahoma State

Did the season start? Baylor

Can the season end?  SMU

Can the season never endOklahoma

GAMES

Play this again:  No. 17 TCU 28, No. 7 Baylor 21

Play this again, too:  No. 9 Stanford 38, No. 6 Notre Dame 36

Never play this again: Memphis 63, SMU 0

What? Washington 45 No. 20 Washington State 10

Huh?  USC 40, No. 22 UCLA 21

Double-huh?  Houston 52, No. 15 Navy 31

Are you kidding me?  No. 9 Stanford 38, No. 6 Notre Dame 36

Oh – my – GodNo. 17 TCU 28, No. 7 Baylor 21

NEXT WEEK

Ticket to die for: Michigan State vs. Iowa for the B1G Championship

Also: North Carolina vs. Clemson for the ACC Championship

Best non-Power Five vs. Power Five matchup: none

Best non-Power Five matchup: Temple @ Houston in the AAC Championship

Upset alert: USC vs. Stanford in the Pac-12 Championship

Must win: Baylor @ TCU (Friday, Nov. 27)

Offensive explosion: Washington State @ Washington (Friday, Nov. 27)

Defensive struggle: Alabama vs. Florida in the SEC Championship

Great game no one is talking about: Air Force @ San Diego State

Intriguing coaching matchup: Larry Fedora of UNC vs. Dabo Swinney of Clemson

Who’s bringing the body bags? Texas @ Baylor

Why are they playing? Texas State @ Arkansas State

Plenty of good seats remaining: New Mexico State @ Louisiana-Monroe

They shoot horses, don’t they?  Troy @ Louisiana-Lafayette

Week 13 Random Thoughts:

Order seems to have been restored in the Big XII Conference, with Oklahoma having emerge from the recent carnage intact and the clear conference front-runner. Going into the Bedlam Series game against rival Oklahoma State, they were already ranked highly enough to clinch a playoff berth. After defeating the Cowboys on the road in a very convincing fashion, they ought to remain in that coveted spot.

Poor Art Briles. First Oklahoma derailed their championship aspirations, then they lost in the near-freezing rain to TCU. One cannot help but feel for him and his team’s inability to catch a break this year. Better luck next season.

Still, in Briles’ defense, when facing a foe in a constant monsoon of a rain (one where the ambient temperate is roughly 38 degrees), such adverse weather conditions tend to skew teams’ performances unpredictably.  Witness unranked Louisville’s upset over then-No. 5 Florida State back in 2002.

Is it too early to point out that we do not know what sort of team we are getting from Texas week-to-week? This same team got off to an horrendous start, albeit to some tough teams, then when everyone left the Longhorns for dead, they upset heavily-favored Oklahoma – the same Oklahoma team that is now surely headed to the playoffs. Then the team turns around and lays a massive egg against lowly Iowa State, embarrasses themselves against West Virginia, and then makes just enough mistakes to lose at home to Texas Tech. This inconsistency is a matter of coaching, as sad as I am to say.

Even though Alabama was supposed to kick butt against Auburn, the Tigers nevertheless made it an engaging, entertaining game, because it was the Iron Bowl.

All that said, this was an excellent weekend for the sport, and the champion games next week are all poised to be entertaining and engaging.

Hello Nebraska. Remember how you fired Bo Pelini because he only went 9-3? How is his replacement, Mike Riley and his 5-7 record work out for you?

Week 12 College Football Awards November 23, 2015

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.
add a comment
OkStBaylor2015

With undefeated Oklahoma State dropping the game at home to Baylor, the Big XII outlook is officially in chaos.  Photo by Tom Pennington of Getty Images.

(Note:  All rankings are current CFP [week 12] unless otherwise noted.)

 

COACHES

Wish I were him: Mark Dantonio, Michigan State

Glad I’m not him: Urban Meyer, Ohio State

Lucky guy: Dan Mullen, Mississippi State

Poor guy:  Bret Bielema, Arkansas

Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Mike Gundy, Oklahoma State

Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Willie Taggart, South Florida

Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Tommy Tuberville, Cincinnati

Desperately seeking … anything:  Les Miles, LSU

TEAMS

Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Alabama (defeated Charleston Southern 56-6)

Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: Florida (defeated Florida Atlantic 20-14, OT)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Kansas (lost to West Virginia 49-0)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t:  Florida Atlantic (lost to No. 8 Florida 20-14, OT)

Thought you wouldn’t kick butt, you did:  South Florida (defeated Cincinnati 65-27)

Dang, they’re good: Oregon

Dang, they’re bad:  Fresno State

Can’t Stand Prosperity:  Houston

Did the season start? Utah

Can the season end?  LSU

Can the season never endOklahoma

GAMES

Play this again:  Michigan State 17, Ohio State 14

Play this again, too:  Mississippi State 51, Arkansas 50

Never play this again: USF 65, Cincinnati 27

What? UCLA 17, No. 13 Utah 9

Huh?  UConn 20, No. 19 Houston 17

Double-HuhNo. 22 Ole Miss 38, No. 15 LSU 17

Are you kidding me?  The Citadel 23, South Carolina 22

Oh – my – GodNo. 9 Michigan State 17, No. 3 Ohio State 14

Told you so:  Georgia 23, Georgia Southern 17

NEXT WEEK

Ticket to die for: Oklahoma @ Oklahoma State

Also: Ohio State @ Michigan

Best non-Power Five vs. Power Five matchup: Georgia Southern @ Georgia

Best non-Power Five matchup: Navy @ Houston (Friday, Nov. 27)

Upset alert: Notre Dame @ Stanford

Must win: Baylor @ TCU (Friday, Nov. 27)

Offensive explosion: Washington State @ Washington (Friday, Nov. 27)

Defensive struggle: Missouri @ Arkansas (Friday, Nov. 27)

Great game no one is talking about: Marshall @ Western Kentucky (Friday, Nov. 27)

Intriguing coaching matchup: David Shaw of Stanford vs. Brian Kelly of Notre Dame

Who’s bringing the body bags? No. 1 Clemson @ South Carolina

Why are they playing? SMU @ Memphis

Plenty of good seats remaining: Louisiana Monroe @ Hawaii

They shoot horses, don’t they?  Charlotte @ Rice

Week 12 Random Thoughts:

No, this was not quite the “Night of the Living Upsets,” not like last week. But as predicted earlier, more separation has taken place. In addition to all the upsets listed above (some consequential in the context of the CFP, others not so much), Baylor arose from the wreckage of last week to upset undefeated Oklahoma State (more on that later). Also, currently-unranked UCLA did defeat No. 13 Utah as well. To be sure, UCLA is far more formidable than the vast majority of unranked teams. Hence, it will be a tough game between the Bruins and crosstown rival USC this next weekend.

Notre Dame had a very close call against Boston College in Fenway Park. The Irish did triumph in the end, 19-16, but with such a low-scoring, close game, how well might they fare at Stanford? The Cardinal is far more formidable than the Eagles, and the Fighting Irish must venture all the way out to the west coast to play them. Hence, the matchup is ripe for an upset.

Way did you have to win, Baylor? After coughing it up to Oklahoma the other week, that already muddled the playoff outlook for the Big XII Conference. Only with Oklahoma State remaining undefeated and the Sooners coming on very strongly as of late, could clarity for the conference’s playoff hopes remain intact. All that ended with Baylor returning to form to upset the heretofore undefeated Cowboys, who, for the record, did NOT play like a playoff team against the visiting Bears.

So, will next week’s game between Baylor and TCU (fresh off two consecutive losses) still be consequential? It certainly could: the Horned Frogs will be playing to salvage something of their season, while the Bears will be playing to maintain as a high a ranking as possible, which itself ought to be well within the top ten after upsetting Oklahoma State last night.

Meanwhile, the latest installment of the Bedlam Series should still be memorable. The Sooners will be gunning for a Top Four CFP berth, and the Cowboys will be looking to play spoiler and to salvage their season in so doing.

As an aside, Art Briles might have become college football’s new Mark Richt. His team seems like a contender every year, but they always trip up somewhere, unexpectedly, derailing their championship hopes in the process.

College Football Week 11 Awards: the Night of the Living Upsets Edition November 16, 2015

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment
Oregon-Stanford2015

The Oregon-Stanford game was a classic matchup of speed vs. power. In the end, Stanford ruined their chances of a playoff berth with two 4th-quarter fumbles. This was but one of many upsets that night which could lead to considerable chaos in the rankings. (AP photo/Tony Avelar)

(Note:  All rankings are current CFP [week 11] unless otherwise noted.)

COACHES Wish I were him: Bob Stoops, Oklahoma

Glad I’m not him: Art Briles, Baylor

Lucky guy: Mark Helfrich, Oregon

Poor guy:  David Shaw, Stanford

Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Mike Gundy, Oklahoma State

Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Doc Holliday, Marshall

Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Les Miles, LSU

Desperately seeking … anything:  Kyle Flood, Rutgers

TEAMS

Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Texas A&M (defeated Western Carolina 42-17)

Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: No. 15 TCU (defeated Kansas 23-17)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Miami (lost to No. 23 North Carolina 59-21)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t:  Purdue (lost to No. 18 Northwestern 21-14)

Thought you wouldn’t kick butt, you did:  Southern Miss (defeated Rice 65-10)

Dang, they’re good: Alabama

Dang, they’re bad:  SMU

Can’t Stand Prosperity:  Baylor

Did the season start? LSU

Can the season end?  Miami (FL)

Can the season never endOklahoma

GAMES

Play this again:  Oregon 36, No. 7 Stanford 34

Play this again, too:  No. 14 Michigan 48, Indiana 41

Never play this again: Marshall 52, FIU 0

What? South Florida 44, No. 22 Temple 23

Huh?  Arizona 37, No. 10 Utah 30, 2OT

Double-HuhOregon 36, No. 7 Stanford 34

Are you kidding me?  No. 12 Oklahoma 44, No. 6 Baylor 34

Oh – my – GodArkansas 31, No. 9 LSU 14

NEXT WEEK

(rankings are week 11 CFP as of right now)

Ticket to die for:  No. 6 Baylor @ No. 8 Oklahoma State

Also:  No. 13 Michigan State @ No. 3 Ohio State

Honorable mention:  USC @ Oregon

Best non-Power Five vs. Power Five matchup: Georgia Southern @ Georgia

Best non-Power Five matchup: No. 21 Memphis @ No. 22 Temple

Upset alert: Boston College vs. No. 4 Notre Dame

Must win: UCLA @ Utah

Also:  No. 12 Oklahoma @ No. 15 TCU

Offensive explosion: Baylor @ Oklahoma State

Defensive struggle:  No. 17 Mississippi State @ Arkansas

Great game no one is talking about:  Louisville @ Pittsburgh

Intriguing coaching matchup:  Mark Dantonio of MSU vs. Urban Meyer of OSU

Who’s bringing the body bags? Charleston Southern @ No. 2 Alabama

Why are they playing? Idaho @ Auburn

Ditto:  Florida Atlantic @ No. 11 Florida

Plenty of good seats remaining: Rice @ UTSA

They shoot horses, don’t they?  Charlotte @ Kentucky

Week 11 Take-aways:

Henceforth let this day, the 14th of November in the Year of Our Lord 2015, be known as the Night of the Living Upsets.  The daylight hours proceeded with each favored team either comfortably sailing by, or at least no worse than slipping away from the occasional close shave.  Then the evening hours descended, and everything seemed to be suddenly turned on its ear.

To wit:

Nobody thought that Arkansas had a chance against LSU.  After all, the Razorbacks were having a mediocre-at-best season, sub-par in any case.  Moreover, Arkansas had only defeated LSU in Baton Rogue just once in the past 20 years.  On the other side of the coin, the Tigers – the Bayou Bengal variety – have been playing very strongly, despite a drubbing to an increasingly dominating Alabama squad.  Yet the Hogs took it to the Tigers, in Death Valley, and did so in dramatic fashion, winning 31-14.  As an aside, the Hogs now have their fourth straight win, having started the season 2-4.

Meanwhile, out on the west coast, a marquee matchup in the Pac-12 took place in Stanford, where the Oregon Ducks took on the Cardinal – formerly the Indians – in a classic match of contrasts, speed vs. power.  Speed ended up winning by default in the end, narrowly, 38-36.  Ironically, it was not Oregon’s speed that killed Stanford as it was the Cardinal’s two inopportune fumbles late in the fourth quarter.  Otherwise, they surely would have won the contest.

In the heart of Texas, Oklahoma came in to Waco to take on Baylor in a rain-soaked showdown.  To the surprise of many, the Bears’ high-powered offense was kept in check the entire game.  Not coincidentally, the Sooners actually played real defense, unlike all the Bears’ previous opponents, but it was still a tough fight throughout the game.  The triumph was nevertheless that of the Sooners, 44-34.

Elsewhere in the southwest, the high-flying Utah squad ventured to Tucson, Ariz., to take on the Arizona Wildcats.  Rich Rodriguez must have been ready for the Utes’ arrival.  His team was surely hungry for a big win, for they, muck like Arkansas in the SEC, have had a mediocre season at best.  In the end, the Wildcats triumphed over the Utes in 2OT, 37-30.

A near-upset occurred, as Houston barely survived Memphis, 35-34.  Those Tigers (as opposed to the LSU, Auburn, or Clemson ones) were in the lead most of the game.  The Cougars very gradually gnawed away at the lead in the second half to eventually snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.  Even then it took a missed field goal on the part of Memphis to finalize the outcome.

Yet another near-upset occurred in Bloomington, Ind., as the Indiana Hoosiers almost knocked off Jim Harbaugh’s Michigan Wolverines.  Only a couple of freak big plays towards the end of regulation in Michigan’s favor saved Harbaugh’s bacon that game, as it put the game in OT where the better talent was able to prevail (which it did, 48-41).

An under-the-radar upset came in the form of South Florida – a nobody the entire season – up-ending No. 22 Temple, 44-23.  Remember, this is the same Temple team that played fourth-ranked Notre Dame tough the entire length of that contest.  Indeed, they almost upset the Irish.  Now the Bulls have decisively beaten/upset the deceptively tough Owls.  Oh my.

Another overlooked upset was New Mexico upsetting Boise State in Boise, Idaho, no less, 31-24.  It took a stop just four years shy of the goal line on the part of the Lobos, with 0:00 on the clock, to ensure the outcome.

Yet another under-the-radar upset was so only because it was out on the west coast, and very late at night, even by Central Time standards.  Unranked Washington State defeated No. 19 UCLA, 31-27, in Pasadena, no less.  The win came on a Hail Mary pass that was completed in the end zone in the final seconds, giving an incredible night full of drama one incredible exclamation mark.

Those of who paid attention to the team schedules knew that this November would be a month of separation.  What we did NOT anticipate was that so much, er, separation, would occur so soon in the month, and on one night alone.  The real kicker?  At only halfway through November, more separation (chaos?) is yet to come!

College Football Week 10 Awards November 9, 2015

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

(Note:  All rankings are current CFP [week 10] unless otherwise noted.)

COACHES

Wish I were him: Dabo Swinney, Clemson

Glad I’m not him: Gary Patterson, TCU

Lucky guy: Butch Jones, Tennessee

Poor guy: Mark Dantonio, Michigan State

Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Kevin Sumlin, Texas A&M

Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Ken Niumatalolo, Navy

Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Justin Fuente, Memphis

Desperately seeking … anything:  Darrell Hazell, Purdue

TEAMS

Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Michigan (defeated Rutgers 49-16)

Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: BYU (defeated San Jose State 17-16)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Colorado (lost to No. 11 Stanford 42-10)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t:  Vanderbilt (lost to No. 10 Florida 9-7)

Thought you wouldn’t kick butt, you did:  Oklahoma State (see below)

Dang, they’re good: Alabama

Dang, they’re bad:  Purdue

Can’t Stand Prosperity:  Memphis

Did the season start? Texas A&M

Can the season end?  Rutgers

Can the season never endClemson

GAMES

Play this again:  No. 1 Clemson 23, No. 16 Florida State 13

Never play this again: Arkansas 63, UT-Martin 28

What? Auburn 20, No. 19 Texas A&M 10

HuhNavy 45, No. 13 Memphis 20

Are you kidding me?  No. 12 Oklahoma State 49, No. 8 TCU 29

Oh – my – GodNebraska 39, No. 7 Michigan State 38

NEXT WEEK

(rankings are current CFP (post-week 10, pre-week 11)

Ticket to die for:  No. 10 Oklahoma @ No. 4 Baylor

Best non-Power Five vs. Power Five matchup: BYU @ Missouri

Best non-Power Five matchup: No. 25 Memphis @ No. 16 Houston

Upset alert: Oregon @ No. 8 Stanford

Must win: Pittsburgh @ Duke

Offensive explosion: Memphis @ Houston

Defensive struggle: Kentucky @ Vanderbilt

Great game no one is talking about:  Texas @ West Virginia

Intriguing coaching matchup:  Art Briles of Baylor vs. Bob Stoops of Oklahoma

Who’s bringing the body bags? Kansas @ No. 13 TCU

Why are they playing? Western Carolina @ Texas A&M

Plenty of good seats remaining: UTSA @ Charlotte (also:  UMass @ Eastern Michigan)

They shoot horses, don’t they?  North Texas @ Tennessee

Week 11 Take-aways:

Two quick notes.  One, it might time to put the expression “[I]t’s time to put “Clemsoning” to bed” to bed.  “Clemsoning,” if you’ll recall, refers to the Tigers usually choking (horribly at that) in big games.  They always coughed it up to the then-stud teams of the ACC, especially Florida State.  A few years ago, they went to the Orange Bowl to play West Virginia, and lost…horribly!  That was early January of 2012.  By the time the Tigers – at No. 12 — returned to the Orange Bowl two years later, this time to play No. 7 Ohio State, the situation was considerably different.  In what cannot be ignored as a statement game, Clemson beat the Buckeyes 40-35, and have not looked back since.  Now they currently sit at the top of the College Football Playoff poll.  Bully for them!

The other quick take-away is that it is now November.  Teams are what they are at this point in the season.  But more to the point, these next few weeks, including this past weekend, will be one of separation.  Teams that were hitherto unbeaten – or at least ranked in the top ten – will now start to butt heads.  Separation shall thus ensure (read:  Alabama’s dominating win over LSU).  Indeed, it hath already begun.  What a glorious month of college football this shall become!

On the Double-Standard of Objectivity and Perfection November 7, 2015

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

It is funny how random memories from days of long past can creep into one’s conscious mind and thus catch one off guard.  One memory that keeps cropping up from time to time dates back to the early Spring semester of my freshman year in college, when I attended a lecture on a course I took on mass media (my misguided and regretful major at that time).  In that lecture, the instructor tried to rationalize away the idea that the mainstream media was liberal-leftist in its bias and hidden ideology/agenda.  He did so by pointing out that news itself is about change (a fair enough point, to be sure), and since change for change’s sake is a driving force for many liberals these days, it left us to surmise that being in the news business would naturally incline towards the leftist ideology.

But then the instructor added something else, too, that human objectivity is an unattainable ideal.  This is the key point on which to focus.  One of the conservatives’ justified gripes against many in the so-called mainstream media is that they are not objective, that their liberal bias shows not only in how they report the stories, but also which stories they report and which stories they deem unworthy of their time by not reporting.  A recent example is the case of the impudent black student in South Carolina whose flagrant disobedience led her to be dragged to the floor and out of the classroom by the school’s security officer.  Fanning the flames of hysteria, the MSM acted like this was a national scandal, and the federal government, (the DOJ in this case) in yet another case of poking its tentacles into a place where it has no business venturing, has said it will conduct a civil rights investigation about the matter.  Seriously?

Yet when a black high school student body-slammed his high school’s principal, we hear hardly a word about it from the MSM.

Yes, it is natural for humans to have our biases.  Indeed, it is part of our nature.  But as rational creatures, we have the potential to overcome them when duty calls for us to do so.  That said, being imperfect beings, despite being made in the image of the Creator, we often fall short of such an ideal.  Nevertheless, the aforementioned double-standard is obvious enough for rational people to see through biases and recognize that these two stories at least deserve equal time so as to allow for an optimally-informed citizenry.  If having such a well-informed citizenry is NOT the goal, then the very usefulness of the journalism profession within the MSM is to be seriously called into question.

Since we acknowledge that pure objectivity is often an unattainable, if not worthy ideal, can we also acknowledge, given the facts of these cases, that ideological bias pre-screens which stories even get reported?

An even deeper systemic problem is the double-standard regarding perfection itself.  To acknowledge the we as human are naturally biased is tantamount to the acknowledgement that we are imperfect beings.  Five and a half millennia of recorded history chronicles all these imperfections of man, and such an incredibly long span of time (from the perspective of mankind in general, not of a geologist!) attests that these imperfections are not going away any time soon.  Not in this life, at least.

Yet that does not prevent many journalists in the MSM and elsewhere from nevertheless clinging to the foolish belief (demonstrated to be foolish by more than 5,000 years of human experience) that mankind is somehow perfectible.  Their naïve yet dangerous idea is that all they need to do to be rewarded in their gigantic leap of faith is to “point the way” to the betterment of man.  Invariably, their way to a more enlightened, perfected species is through more and more government-sponsored indoctrination, government intervention, and control.

Such dangerous, authoritarian ideas naturally attract a coalition of other groups and individuals who see a government increased in magnitude, strength, and centrality to our lives as a way of begetting their own parochial agendas, from political feminists (is there any other kind?) to race hustlers, to environmental activists.

The overall point is, the lack of objectivity one can discern from stories printed in the New York Times to the flagrant malpractice on display by the CNBC crew at the most recent Republican primary debate is at once part of a double-standard that liberal sycophants all too readily rationalize, while at the same time ignore a far more systemic problem.  Yes, it is all well and good to acknowledge that we cannot expect perfect objectivity from reporters at that level of journalism.  But can they at least try?  The fact that they seem not to suggests an ideological filtering of those who enter this profession in the first place.  Is it any wonder that former basketball coach Bobby Knight had such disdain for the profession?  That is to say, folks go into the MSM already with an agenda, and leave objectivity at the front door, never to reclaim it.

Even more disturbing?  Their own lack of clarity of thought will lead them to quickly point out that they themselves are flawed when it comes to objectivity (or lack thereof), yet turn around and cling to the faith of the perfectibility of man.

Looking Forward, Not Backward, through Conservatism November 6, 2015

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Ronald_Reagan1The essence of conservatism, in general (i.e., not through any particular nationalist lens) is defending the existing order of things.  Thus, conservatism means different things in different countries, depending on what is, or was until recently, the status quo.  In Russia or China, for example, being conservative means that you are a communist, and have disdain for the new order brought on my free[er] markets in those respective countries.  Same goes for the countries in the Balkans, where some people still, oddly, long for the days of communist rule because it guaranteed them some sort of employment.  Perhaps when one has been a serf for more than a millennium, one tends to be quick to sell off one’s birthright for even the most meager messes of pottage.

But in any case, the American version of conservatism is to defend that which you already have, that being, individual liberty and a free market, both defended by a limited government.  Indeed, the citizens of the original Thirteen Colonies already had this in the 18th Century, and was not until after the French and Indian War concluded in 1763 did the British have the bright idea to arbitrarily mess with this good thing the colonists in North America already had going at that time.  For example, the standard of living in the American colonies was already higher in the years leading up to the Revolutionary War.  Therein lies a key thing to remember, that the colonists did not separate from Great Britain and risk blood and treasure in so doing to create something radically new, but to defend that which they already had.

The same impulse in this shared ideology continues strongly today, as well it should.  After all, Thomas Jefferson famously reminded us in all times to come that eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.  The only problem is, electorally, it can sometimes be a double-edge sword.

Two recent examples are the redefinition of marriage and Obamacare.  Those who care for long-held traditions that have been established over millennia, and established for good reasons born out of experience through the ages, have been understandably dismayed at the development of five Supreme Court judges arbitrarily changing that sacred definition.  To suggest that marriage should be redefined as being legitimate if it is between two men or two women instead of the traditional definition of one man, and one woman, shows incredible arrogance in that this generation is wiser than all the collective wisdom of all of our forbearers.  Such a thinking is reckless for the present and outright destructive for the future.

Moreover, Obamacare has caused far more problems than it solved.  Yes, it allowed previously uninsurable people access to health insurance, but it has come at considerable cost.  Everybody’s insurance premiums have skyrocketed on account of this Orwellian-named Affordable Care Act.  One family can pay as much as $20,000 a year, and if you do not buy the insurance, you pay a fine (albeit much less than the aforementioned gouging).  This Act, which is considered to be Obama’s greatest achievement, gives many people the perverse economic incentive to pay the fine.

For those of us who were happy with the insurance we already had, we ended up losing some of our doctors on account of sudden changes in insurance networks, but our premiums continue to go up and up, not only on account of having to insure the expensively uninsurable, but, more to the point, having to pay for “options” we do not even want.  Why should men, for example, be forced to pay for an insurance policy that offers birth control?  Why should all of us, man or woman, we force to pay for a policy that provides for acupuncture?

So what to do?  The impulse to defend can misguide us to often look back.  But to be electorally viable, we must look forward.  Young people especially are not concerned with some supposedly idyllic past.  Even the recent past of Clinton and (eventually) Obama in the White House is certainly no past destination to return.  Moreover, it has been almost 27 years since the late, great, Ronald Reagan was in the White House.

Conservatism’s strength comes in two major dimensions:  its practicality, and its optimism.  For this piece, let us focus on the latter as a winning tool to win elections and to create a winning vision moving forward.

Start with marriage.  The institution of marriage has been the central unit of society since before recorded history (which started around 3500 BC, fyi).  It has proven, over the course of centuries and millennia, to be the cornerstone of solid, functioning families, which themselves are vital to a well-functioning society.  Within the institution of marriage, it has proven over the same immense span of time that the institution functions best when it is comprised of one man and one woman.  The reason is twofold:  for one, it takes a man and a woman to be able to get together so as to procreate.  For another, the partnership of a man and a woman is mutually beneficial to both sexes, as such a union helps both mates help curb the excesses sewn into the nature of both sexes.  Most importantly, the central reason for marriage is for the successful raising of children, so that society’s values and culture can be as successfully passed on through a married couple’s children. The different kinds of love that originates from father and mother respectively help put children in the best possible positions to be well-adjusted, productive members of society.  Family break-down hinders both the successful raising of children, and consequently it creates defective, instead of functional, cultures.  Just look at the high illegitimacy rates in the black-dominated inner city neighborhoods; such high out-of-wedlock birthrates, combined with an alarmingly high rate of absent fathers negatively affect those children’s lives.  Such family break-down those leads to the forming of bad-warped values that leads to high crime and poverty rates.

The solution?  As conservatives, we must not try to fight increasingly old battles about same-sex marriage, but rather work to strengthen traditional marriage, especially within the context of how it best benefits children in particular and families in general.  Fighting old battles is a losing proposition.  Looking forward is a winning one.

Concerning Obamacare, instead of fighting to repeal it, let us concentrate our energies to move forward by way of reforming it.  By doing so, we conservatives can seize an even greater macro opportunity by positioning ourselves as people who stand for reform in general.  Big government has proven not to work time and again, especially in an age where most companies are becoming less bureaucratic and more nimble, and technology gives us more options than ever before.  We are therefore perfectly positioned to fight to reform government by making it more streamlined, less bloated and rigid, and allow people more options.

Obamacare is a perfect place to start.  Its central problem?  In classic, big-government fashion, it is a one-size-fits-all model, and thus allows for no options.  We cannot decide what we want on our policy and what we do not want.  Government dictates what we must buy for our policies, even if it is too expensive for most discerning buyers.  If we do not like it?  Tough.  Why not allow for people to decide for themselves what they want to buy and what they do not want based on what they can afford and what they actually need?  Again, as conservatives, we are in the perfect position to offer reform policies in government that would thus allow for people to have these common sense options.  Doing so would be perfectly in line with government upholding liberty (a conservative tenet) by allowing for such common sense solutions-as-options.

Defending that which we have (our families and liberties) does not mean we must always look backward, either.  Being conservative does not, nor should it automatically equate to being reactionary.  Part of being a conservative is being practical:  that is to stay, understanding what works and what does not work, and to act accordingly.  The Constitution, for example, might not be a perfect document, but it certainly is a practical one, and has proven to be for more than two centuries and counting.  Moreover, the human being as an organism is goal-oriented in its very nature.  Such a nature was conveniently overlooked by Karl Marx, who, along with Friederich Engels, had his head in the clouds about an unattainable ideal of economic equality.  It never works because it ignores this central tenet to human nature.

But more to the point, being goal-oriented means that one instinctively looks to the future, since therein lies the goal that the individual wishes to attain.  Our Constitution was constructed on the idea to create the best possible system of government and economics within the confines of human nature.  Why not therefore use this conservative tendency constructively in the same way?

Therefore, look forward and sell the voting public on why conservative principles of a free market will create a better economic system now and in the future for people of all walks of life.  On the social side of the equation, we must, as cooperative individuals, work to strengthen traditional marriage.  Politically, we must dismantle policies that give perverse incentives for families to disintegrate so as to cut off what is in effect the funding of inter-generational social problems in the inner city and elsewhere.

Back to the free market side of things, we must look forward to a freer economy that creates better opportunities for people of all walks of life – including those in the inner city – by scaling back and streaming regulations so that people addicted to welfare who are otherwise able-bodied will have ample opportunity to act on another conservative tenet, that of self-reliance.  Looking at it another way, as a purely pragmatic way of looking at things, young people of today are becoming an increasingly large portion of the electorate, and their sole focus is looking forward, not looking back to try to recapture the past.

The genius to the central messages of Ronald Reagan was that conservatism works just as well in modern times as it did when America was founded in the late 18th Century.  Reagan was always optimistic about the future because he recognized that, as long as these same principles were headed now and in the future, things will continue to work well.

Though it was been more than three decades since Reagan was re-elected in an historic landslide, our best political solution as conservatives is to take the same approach and look forward with winning, practical policies that promise, and invariably deliver, a better future.

College Football Week 9 Awards November 2, 2015

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment
duke_miami_gms_20151031

One of a few missed calls during the hap-hazard, yet incredible, 8-lateral kickoff return finish my Miami in yesterday’s game. Paging Cal-Stanford 1982: you now have competition.

(Note:  All rankings are current AP [week 9] unless otherwise noted.)

COACHES

Wish I were him: Jim McElwain, Florida

Glad I’m not him: Gus Malzahn, Auburn

Lucky guy: Mark Helfrich, Oregon

Poor guy: Mark Richt, Georgia

Desperately seeking a wake-up call: Bobby Petrino, Louisville

Desperately seeking a P.R. man: Jeff Brohm, Western Kentucky

Desperately seeking sunglasses and a fake beard: Charlie Strong, Texas

Desperately seeking … anything:  Mike Riley, Nebraska

TEAMS

Thought you’d kick butt, you did: Oklahoma (defeated Kansas 62-7)

Thought you’d kick butt, you didn’t: Texas A&M (defeated South Carolina 35-28)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you did: Vanderbilt (lost to No. 18 Houston 34-0)

Thought you’d get your butt kicked, you didn’t:  Purdue (see below)

Thought you wouldn’t kick butt, you did:  Tennessee (defeated Kentucky 52-21)

Dang, they’re good: Florida

Dang, they’re bad:  UMass

Can’t Stand Prosperity:  Pitt

Did the season start? Arizona

Can the season end?  UCF

Can the season never endHouston

GAMES

Play this again:  No. 9 Notre Dame 24, No. 21 Temple 20

Play this again, too:  Oregon 61, Arizona State 55 (3OT)

Never play this again: Arkansas 63, UT-Martin 28

What? North Carolina 26, No. 23 Pittsburgh 19

HuhMiami 30, No. 22 Duke 27

Are you kidding me?  Purdue 55, Nebraska 45

Oh – my – GodIowa State 24, Texas 0

NEXT WEEK

(rankings are current AP (post-week 9, pre-week 10)

Ticket to die for:  No. 4 LSU @ No. 7 Alabama

Also:  No. 5 TCU @ No. 12 Oklahoma State

Make it a Trifecta:  No. 17 Florida State @ No. 3 Clemson

Best non-Power Five vs. Power Five matchup: (none)

Best non-Power Five matchup: Navy @ No. 16 Memphis

Upset alert: No. 13 Utah @ Washington

Must win: Duke @ No. 21 North Carolina

Offensive explosion: Cincinnati @ No. 18 Houston (also TCU @ OKST)

Defensive struggle: Syracuse @ Louisville

Great game no one is talking about:  Penn State @ Northwestern

Intriguing coaching matchup:  Todd Graham of ASU vs. Mike Leach of WSU

Who’s bringing the body bags? Vanderbilt @ No. 11 Florida

Why are they playing? BYU @ San Jose State (Friday)

Plenty of good seats remaining: Hawaii @ UNLV

They shoot horses, don’t they?  Kansas @ Texas

Week 9 Take-aways:

First it was Michigan State’s blocked punt that they recovered and ran back for a score with 0:00 left on the clock to beat rival Michigan in the Big House (they were behind prior to said score).  Last week was followed up by Georgia Tech’s fantastic finish, whereby they blocked a Florida State field goal attempt at home, ran it back for a score and thus broke the tie as time expired.  This week, the Miami Hurricanes – fresh from both a devastating home loss to Clemson and the subsequent firing of head coach Al Golden – made an eight-lateral play on a kickoff return that harkens directly back to Cal-Stanford 1982, for the game-winning touchdown, over then-ranked Duke, on the road.  Three weeks in a row, three fantastic, historic finishes.

Well, sort of.  There were tons of blown calls on that play, including an illegal block in the back (or two), and at one point, one of the lateralling players for Miami had his knee already down before he tossed the ball sideways.  The overlooked calls were so blatant that the ACC suspended the officiating crew the following day.  Could it be that the game result itself be overturned?  We shall all have to stay tuned.

Bobby Petrino must be beside himself.  Despite his able coaching, his players made mistake after mistake on the road against Wake Forest.  Yet somehow they managed to barely win.  Despite consecutive wins, this performance is not a sustainable path.  Something must be done for the team to improve so as to win sustainably.  An infusion of discipline would be both a quick and effective remedy.

Poor Mark Richt.  Despite all the success he has had at Georgia, he just cannot get over the hump.  A statistic during the debacle of a game against Florida (the Gators thumped the rival Bulldogs 27-3 at this year’s World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party in Jacksonville) showed that Richt is 5-15 against ranked opponents during his tenure at UGA.  Moreover, he is 5-9 against Florida, despite being 141-51 overall.  The first stat alone indicates that he has peaked during his tenure at Georgia, that he has gone as far as he can with that program.  Some new, dynamic blood in Athens, Ga., would perhaps finally help get the Bulldogs to consistent dominance of the SEC East, while Miami, Richt’s alma mater, has a head coach opening just waiting for a rock-solid fellow such as he.  If such a scenario were to play out, it could benefit both parties concerned, the latter particularly, with a fresh start.

What on Earth has happened to Arizona?  Early in the season, we anticipated they would be a factor in the Pac-12.  Last night, they embarrassed themselves on the road at Washington, after coughing up the game to Wazzu the previous week.  The Wildcats will not have much time to lick their wounds, either, as next week they take on USC, followed by Utah the week after, and the week after that they close the regular season against rival Arizona State, possibly with a 5-7 at this rate (they are current 5-4, and 2-4 in the conference).