jump to navigation

A Beginner’s “Classical” Music primer November 16, 2011

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Pop Culture.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

For those who don’t know me, I am known — unofficially! — by family and friends alike as “The Music Professor,” and have been called upon from time to time to offer my consultations as to what sort of tunes would be appropriate for certain occasions, etc.  In any event, a little over a year ago, a friend of mine from a previous job got ahold me via Facebook and was looking to expand his musical library by getting into “classical” music, but he said he was intimidated by all the choices out there.  No doubt many an unsuspecting soul has been in his exact shoes, and given all the options out there for “classical” music, this is entirely understood.

What I therefore set out to do with this and other installments is to give you, the beginner to this mega-genre, the break-down of what’s out there, and also to share with you some examples of certain areas of composition, not to mention what I consider to be some of the choicest pieces ever written.

Let us start with a few basics:  what is considered “classical” is actually a hodgepodge of three genres, Baroque, Classical and Romantic.  Keep in mind that these periods are not necessarily just musical, but whole artistic periods encompassing architecture, painting, sculpture, and literature.  There are definite painting styles, for example, that can be discerned during these three periods of time.  Moreover, one thing that defined the Baroque period aside from its wonderful music was the Rococo architecture.

The Baroque period is considered from 1600-1750, though most Baroque stuff you’re likely to run across is usually no earlier than 1680 unless you’re listening to something composed by Henry Purcell or, even earlier, Claudio Monteverdi.  To be clear, most of the more recognized Baroque compositions are, with some notable exceptions, were written between 1700 and 1750.

Then there’s the Classical epoch, which is considered to start in 1750, though it’s end time is debated to be between 1800 and 1820 (I say about 1810).  The Romantic period takes up the rest of the 19th Century up until 1900.  Do the math, you have 300 years of composed music called “classical,” yet only about 60 years (give or take) of that are truly Classical.

What’s the difference between the three?  Basically, the Baroque music is very elaborate and cerebral:  it’s therefore my favorite of the three!  It’s also the most highly cultured of the three.  Put in some good Baroque music, and it’s instant ornate Rococo time — the very height of cultured erudition of modern man.

Classical’s aim is to strike the perfect balance between the cerebral and the emotional.  Still very highly cultured, hardly out of place in a Rococo setting, and always a pleasure to listen to.

Romantic is almost all emotional:  I find it boring, with some exceptions.  Others love it and pay little heed to the Baroque (i.e., the cerebral) side of the mega-genre.  But that is fine:  such is why there is a diversity of ice cream flavors — some prefer vanilla, others chocolate, others strawberry, and so on.  To each his own!

Johann Sebastian Bach is my favorite composer:  VERY Baroque.  He lived from 1685-1750, and though not the first composer by a long shot, he’s considered the “Father of Composers.”  There’s hardly an equal.  Other good Baroque composers include Georg Friedrich Handel (that’s pronouced “HEN-dle”), Antonio Vivaldi, Arcangelo Corelli, the aforementioned Purcell, Johann Pachelbel (whose “Canon,” written in 1680, is universally recognized), and many others.

The two classical composers who stand out above anybody else are, of course, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Franz Josef Haydn.  I love both of them — can’t go wrong with either, particularly Mozart, the “Prodigy from Salzburg,” who is quite possibly the greatest composer of all time.

Ludwig Van Beethoven is considered to have started the Romantic period, though his early stuff is very Classical.  His later stuff is quite distinct from his early stuff — clearly early Romantic, but his Symphonies are still quite paletable.  I like his 6th Symphony the best, but his 7th isn’t bad, and his 5th and 9th are ever-famous.  When you get into composers like Tchaikovsky, you’re talking late Romantic (he wrote his Nutcracker Suite in 1892, fyi). Perhaps the best example of the middle part of the Romantic period would be the works of Richard Wagner.

The recommended compositions could fill a book, but for Baroque stuff, I like most things done by Trevor Pinnock’s English Concert ensemble (they use period instruments — can’t beat that!).  Meanwhile, Sir Neville Marriner does excellent Mozart renditions. For hard-core period instrument purists, one cannot do any better than compositions performed by Christopher Hogwood and the Academy of Ancient Music (don’t let the title fool you — Baroque and Classical are their specialities).

For Vivaldi, check out his “Four Seasons.”  His “Spring” concerto will no doubt be familiar.

Handel, of course, had his “Messiah” (first written in 1741 — late Baroque), but he’s got many other great compositions under his belt, namely his “Water Music.”

I’ve never heard a bad piece by Haydn — great stuff.  Try some of his later Symphonies, namely in the 80 thru 100 range.

With Mozart, again, where does one begin?  I LOVE his Symphonies, especially his 25th and 29th.  I’ve got all 41 that he composed on my Tunes.  Check out some of his overtures to his operas, namely the one to “Figaro” and to “The Magic Flute.”  Of course, don’t forget “Eine Kleine Nachtmusik.”  Sir Neville Marriner’s Academy of St. Martin-in-the-Fields does a fine rendition of it, as well as anything else Mozart.

If you have sampled any of this music already, the contrast between the Baroque and the true Classical should be immediately evident, what with the heavier polyphony (in Greek, that basically means “many sounds”) in the former and the lighter polyphony of the latter.  Another big thing worth noticing is that Baroque pieces usually used a harpsichord to provide that they called the “basso continuo,” but they gradually de-emphasized that during the Classical epoch.

Then there’s Bach (saving the best for last!).  Start with his Brandenburg Concertos (again, Trevor Pinnock does a solid job with these).  He wrote six of them.  My personal favorites are No’s 2 and 5, though the dear reader would no doubt find No. 3 to be familiar.

He the best music ever for the pipe organ.  Give a listen to his “Little” Organ fugue in G-minor, or his famous Toccata and Fugue in D-minor.  Once you hear a Bach organ fugue, you have heard the highest of high culture in musical form.

Also great is his Violin Concerto No. 2 in E (listen to the first and third movements — the latter was featured in “The Patriot”).  He wrote tons of concerti like that.  Needless to say, there is plenty more to be heard and discussed about the the wonderful music of J.S. Bach.

Subseqent primer installments in the weeks and months to come will look into more specialized areas of the music in a little more depth.  Until then, this should at least help you start to know and understand a few things.

WWWD (What would Woody do)? November 14, 2011

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Sports.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

How would Woody have done it?  That is a popular question to ask in Columbus, Ohio, and throughout the Buckeye State.  It can be a very effective conversation-starter in that part of the country, though beware of the side-effect of it possibly sparking some not-so-civil debates, too.  But it may seem like an odd question to ask in the wake of the earth-shaking scandal at conference neighbor Penn State, a controversy so huge it has already resulted not only in the immediate termination of 46-year head coach Joe Paterno, but also in that athletics director Tim Curley has been placed on administrative leave, as he is charged with perjury and failure to report a crime, not to mention the resignation of the university president himself.  In case you have been under a rock for the past eight days or so, long-time Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky, who mysteriously retired from coaching at age 55 in 1999, has been charged with molesting a total of eight young boys (that we know of) over the past 15 years.

In hindsight, it has been alleged that Sandusky’s retirement at that relatively early age came about because this perverted proclivity of his was an obvious liability to the program, and was quietly nudged out.  Still, for the past 12 years, not only has Sandusky been allowed back on campus, but was granted practically unlimited access to the football facilities (locker room, weight
room, you name it) and was on campus frequently as part of his non-profit organization that he established to help at-risk youth – commendable thing by itself, to be sure.

If I do a little rudimentary arithmetic, 2011 minus 15 equals 1996.  Yet Sandusky was not gently nudged out until 1999, three years later.  That alone does not seem right.  So I come back to my original inquiry:  how would Woody have handled it?  Given his hard-nosed, no-nonsense demeanor, one can surmise two possible scenarios.

Scenario A:  Upon learning the news that Woody has a sick pervert on his staff, Woody, barges into that coach’s office, confronts him point-blank, with the upshot that said coach has 15 minutes to clear out his office before he calls campus security, and follows up with the ultimatum that said coach better not do so much as come within a hundred yards of the campus ever again, or there shall be hell to pay.

Scenario B:  Instead of the pedophile coach being charged with child molestation, Woody would be charged with manslaughter, for many a red-blooded American male would find it to be his manly duty to dispatch with the pervert himself with one’s own bare hands.

The reason I mention Woody at all in the wake of these now-discovered, hideous, though alleged, evils on the part of Jerry Sandusky is there is some commonality with the late Wayne Woodrow Hayes and Joe[Grand]Pa.  Both are/were larger-than-life figures for their respective programs.  Both have/had won national championships.  Moreover, both have been known, either publicly or privately, as uncompromising, my-way-or-the-highway leaders, and both careers ended in scandal, albeit to varying degrees.

But an even bigger reason for mentioning Hayes at a time like this is that both he and Paterno are considered “old school.”  The aforementioned “scenarios” are surely commensurate with an “old school” solution to having such a pervert in one’s midst.  Unfortunately in this case, those are not the only two old school scenarios out there.  Even more unfortunately, Paterno chose old
school Scenario C:  keep it quiet, and sweep it under the rug.  Not really a good idea back then, and a horrible one in these modern times.

The rationalizations for Paterno not dealing with this problem in a more direct manner are fairly diverse, among those being “maybe he did not know.”  Puh-leeze.  As a former staff member on a Big Ten football team, I have witnessed first-hand the long hours the head coach and his assistants alike work for months on end.  A coaching staff in D-1 college football becomes a very closely-knit bunch.  There is no physical way on this Earth that the other coaches did not know about Sandusky’s alleged perversion.  Anyone to suggest otherwise knows nothing about the social nature and the demands of the profession.

Given this reality, how come nothing was done to address this glaring liability?  The aforementioned “Scenario C” only partially provides the answer.  A more thorough explanation would be the overall organizational culture, something one can only lay at the feet of the head coach himself.  As I have explained to many of my students when teaching business courses at National College in
Louisville, Ky., the head coach of a football program is in every way the CEO of that program.  The main job of the CEO of any organization is not only to set the company’s strategy (to both devise and implement), but to set the organization’s tone – indeed, it’s very culture.  As we the public have now discovered in the most unwitting way possible – within reason – the culture Paterno established was one of enabling, as in, looking the other way.

Seeing things another way, can one see other “old school” coaches establishing an enabling culture like at Penn State?  Could one envision, say, Barry Switzer, Howard Schnellenberger, Bear Bryant, or even Lou Holtz countenancing such alleged evils on their watch?

There are many lessons to be learned from this stranger-than-fiction, sordid tale.  I could have thought of a few possible ways that would lead to JoePa’s long-overdue departure, but if somebody earlier this year told me that a scandal of this magnitude would A) actually occur, and B) lead to Paterno’s immediate ouster, I would have said they were crazy.  But aside from that, the lessons:

Lesson 1:  It never ends well for these geriatric head coaches that have been a legendary, overpowering fixture at a program for multiple decades when they do not know when it is time to exit the stage.  Just ask Florida State’s dad-gum coach Bobby Bowden.  To the credit of Bear Bryant, arguably the greatest coach of all time in any sport, not just football, he finally figured out when it was time to say “when.”  It ended well for him (he even went out winning a bowl game).  Not so much Sweet Ol’ Bobby, nor for Joe[Grand]Pa.

Lesson 2:  An enabling culture will eventually come back to haunt you, whether you are a living legend, or a young, seemingly innocent up-and-comer (e.g., Mike McQueary).  If you are the latter, it can ruin your career before it fully develops.  If you are the former, it can permanently tarnish if not outright ruin the legacy you have labored decades to build.

Lesson 3:  Speaking of not ending well, that is particularly the case for these dictatorial, inflexible, my-way-or-the-highway head coaches, as Joe Paterno is now learning the hard way (at age 84).  He could have learned this lesson from Frank Kush at Arizona State.  Heck, he could have asked Woody.

‘Like’ this site on Facebook to stay updated!

Asteroid headed for Earth….sort of. November 7, 2011

Posted by intellectualgridiron in Science.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

No doubt everyone can breathe a sigh of relief after reading those last two words of the headline.  But it is true, sort of.  An asteroid that is a quarter of a mile long — bigger than even America’s largest aircraft carrier, is headed towards the near-vicinity of Earth.  Officially named YU55, its current trajectory has it flying by the third rock from the Sun on Nov. 8 at a distance of only 202,ooo miles — closer than the Moon (at only 240,000 miles away).

Scientists have been studying this asteroid long enough to be as certain as humanly possible that it will not hit Earth.  If it did — Heaven forbid —  though, the result would be a possible oceanic impact, with 70-foot tsunami waves 60 miles away, and causing a 7.0 earthquake that that part of the world.  So says asteroid impact expert Jay Melosh of Purdue University, my alma mater.

This scenario pales in comparison to the fictional scenario from Armageddon, where that fictional asteroid was the size of Texas, and should it have crashed into the Pacific Ocean, would have caused a tidal wave to wash up to Denver, and enough dust to cloud out the Sun for an epoch.  But as Melosh points out, impacts of the relative proportion of the very real YU55 happen about every 100,000 years.  The comforting, silver lining in that otherwise rather disturbing thought is that such impacts are survivable, provided that you’re not within, say, 75 to 100 miles of said impact.

In the meantime, though, this close encounter with the asteroid kind gives scientists and lay astronomers alike the golden opportunity to see a huge chunk of extraterrestrial rock up close and personally.  Sites for astronomy enthusiasts have been mapping where in the sky YU55 is expected to pass through.  But more importantly, a prevailing theory regarding how the Earth took form involves asteroids, specifically that they were responsible for depositing water and minerals on the planet as it was cooling some two or three billion years ago.  YU55’s close, though fleeting, proximity will give professional researchers the opportunity to collect telemetric data that will allow for scientists to test this theory.  It also lets astronomers take a close look at the class “C” of asteroids, which are very common but not very well understood.  No doubt the upcoming astronomical event could help us rectify that problem.